2002
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiphase mixed-effects models for repeated measures data.

Abstract: Behavior that develops in phases may exhibit distinctively different rates of change in one time period than in others. In this article, a mixed-effects model for a response that displays identifiable regimes is reviewed. An interesting component of the model is the change point. In substantive terms, the change point is the time when development switches from one phase to another. In a mixed-effects model, the change point can be a random coefficient. This possibility allows individuals to make the transition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
180
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
180
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Values close to zero on these variables would indicate an individual who is verified by his or her partner. This method has been recommended by Edwards (1994) and Griffin et al (1999), and it is consistent with the use of spline models in regression analysis (Cudeck & Klebe, 2002;Marsh & Cormier, 2002).…”
Section: Analytic Approachmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Values close to zero on these variables would indicate an individual who is verified by his or her partner. This method has been recommended by Edwards (1994) and Griffin et al (1999), and it is consistent with the use of spline models in regression analysis (Cudeck & Klebe, 2002;Marsh & Cormier, 2002).…”
Section: Analytic Approachmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…(i.e., Level-2 model) where γ 00 , γ 01 , and γ 02 are sample means, and u 0i , and u 1i are individual deviations from those means that are assumed to be normally distributed, correlated with each other, and uncorrelated with the residual errors, e it . Deviations for the quadratic slope, u 2i were examined, but were not significant and thus not included in the final models.Notions of terminal decline were invoked using extensions (Cudeck & Harring, 2007;Cudeck & Klebe, 2002) of multiphase or "spline" growth models (Ram & Grimm, 2007;Singer & Willett, 2003) with a distance-to-death, DtD, time variable. Specifically, models were specified as…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LME models the process of change in the studied population as well as at the individual level, while accounting for the correlation of observations within individuals and the imbalance in the number of observations per individual (Cudeck and Klebe, 2002;Laird and Ware, 1982;Raudenbush and Bryk, 2002). In the analysis, models were built sequentially, starting with a model assuming no trend either at the individual or population level, to a model containing both individual and population trends.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on psychological symptoms score were analyzed using linear mixed effects (LME) regression models (Cudeck and Klebe, 2002). LME models the process of change in the studied population as well as at the individual level, while accounting for the correlation of observations within individuals and the imbalance in the number of observations per individual (Cudeck and Klebe, 2002;Laird and Ware, 1982;Raudenbush and Bryk, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%