2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiphase Risk-Management Method and Its Application in Tunnel Engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While applying observational modelling, the lesson learnt from the earlier stage of the same project is used to reduce the size of the initial risk. Progressive application of such dynamic risk management is termed as Multiphase Risk Management Method [192] [193]. Furthermore, the cushion layer compressibility and the interaction effects among each pile while the soil moves around the piles would require 3D finite element analysis.…”
Section: Risk Management Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While applying observational modelling, the lesson learnt from the earlier stage of the same project is used to reduce the size of the initial risk. Progressive application of such dynamic risk management is termed as Multiphase Risk Management Method [192] [193]. Furthermore, the cushion layer compressibility and the interaction effects among each pile while the soil moves around the piles would require 3D finite element analysis.…”
Section: Risk Management Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [16] studied the probability of risk occurrence, potential consequence, and level of rockburst risk in the Jinping II hydropower station. To update the variation of new knowledge and early warnings, Bai et al [17], Shalev et al [18], Paltrinieri et al [19], and Khan et al [20] explored dynamic risk management and updated risk evaluation to lessen uncertainty, since any process is subject to constant evolution due to natural or human causes [20]. These studies provided valuable methods for analysis and assessment of risk of delayed payment in LHPC.…”
Section: Model Namementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other soil, the loess has special structural and water sensitivity: (1) the joint fissure is developed, the mesoscopic structure is porous, and the difference of dry and wet strength is remarkable; (2) most of them have strong collapsibility, softening, and deforming in water [2][3][4][5][6]. Therefore, the change of water environment is very easy to induce engineering geological hazard, and the effect of humankind engineering activity can easily increase the disaster of loess [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. In the past 10 years, Xi'an city, as a main developing city in Western China, has taken the leadership in large-scale construction of subway in the loess strata [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil model followed the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion [69], and the pore water pressure obeyed Darcy's law in order to appropriately Figure 12: Surrounding rock pressure-time curves of Y1, Y2, and Y3. 8 Geofluids simulate the seepage of saturated loess. In the modeling, the lower boundary of the model restricted displacement in the X and Y directions, in which two sides of the model restricted displacement in the X direction.…”
Section: Modeling Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%