2018
DOI: 10.1002/int.22001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple attribute decision-making method for dealing with heterogeneous relationship among attributes and unknown attribute weight information under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment

Abstract: A Q‐rung orthopair fuzzy set (q‐ROFS) originally proposed by Yager (2017) is a new generalization of orthopair fuzzy sets, which has a larger representation space of acceptable membership grades and gives decision makers more flexibility to express their real preferences. In this paper, for multiple attribute decision‐making problems with q‐rung orthopair fuzzy information, we propose a new method for dealing with heterogeneous relationship among attributes and unknown attribute weight information. First, we p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ali presented two new approaches for viewing q ‐ROFSs. Liu et al put forward MCDM method for dealing with heterogeneous relationship among attributes and unknown attribute weight information under q ‐ROFS environment. Yager et al investigated the concepts of possibility and certainty as well as plausibility and belief in q ‐ROFS environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Ali presented two new approaches for viewing q ‐ROFSs. Liu et al put forward MCDM method for dealing with heterogeneous relationship among attributes and unknown attribute weight information under q ‐ROFS environment. Yager et al investigated the concepts of possibility and certainty as well as plausibility and belief in q ‐ROFS environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjective weighting methods place emphasis on the preference information of the experts, while they ignore the objective evaluation information. The objective weight‐determining methods do not take the preference of the decision‐maker into consideration, that is to say, these approaches fail to take the risk attitude of the decision‐maker into account . The feature of our weighting model can have both the subjective information and the objective information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specially, Yager et al developed the OWA and Choquet aggregation operations on q‐ROFSs. Along this line of research, Liu and his colleagues introduced the weighted averaging/geometric operation, (weighted, geometric) Bonferroni mean operation, (weighted) extended Bonferroni mean operation, (weighted) Archimedean Bonferroni mean operation, power (weighted) Maclaurin symmetric mean operation, and (weighted) Heronian mean operation on q‐ROFSs. Wei et al further put forward the generalized (weighted) Heronian mean operation and (weighted) geometric Heronian mean operation for q‐ROFSs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%