“…Overall, the consecutive replacements of the amide ligand by the rigid guanidinate ligand decrease the ligand donation into the metal 5d shell, due to less optimal overlap when going from 2-Cl to [4+] , while simultaneously increasing the 4f participation in the metal–ligand bonding orbitals. Related scenarios have been reported for Ce( iv )/Th( iv ) imido complexes, 42 lanthanide dioxides and sesquioxides, 45,76 [LnCl 6 ] x − ( x = 2, 3; Ln = Ce IV , Ce III , Nd III , Sm III , Eu III , Gd III ), 30 and [AnCl 6 ] 2− (An(IV) = Th, U, Np, Pu). 77 The NLMOs show one Ce–Cl σ bond and two Ce–Cl π bonds, which have similar bonding characteristics to the computed Ce-amide bonds.…”