2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:coge.0000030002.01948.b3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple bottlenecks in threatened western European populations of the common hamster Cricetus cricetus (L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9) might thus be a result of the coincidence of population decline and habitat fragmentation, which has been discussed to be a reason for the decline of many species (Hanski 1998), including European hamsters (Weinhold 2008). Besides a risk for increased mortality due to traffic 132 and a long-term reduction in genetic diversity due to isolation (Neumann et al 2004, Feoktistova et al 2016 habitat fragmentation might pose an additional possible threat to reproduction. In captive European hamster colonies, higher litter sizes were observed after a male from another colony was introduced (La Haye et al 2012a, L. Heimann pers.…”
Section: Fragmentation Of the Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…9) might thus be a result of the coincidence of population decline and habitat fragmentation, which has been discussed to be a reason for the decline of many species (Hanski 1998), including European hamsters (Weinhold 2008). Besides a risk for increased mortality due to traffic 132 and a long-term reduction in genetic diversity due to isolation (Neumann et al 2004, Feoktistova et al 2016 habitat fragmentation might pose an additional possible threat to reproduction. In captive European hamster colonies, higher litter sizes were observed after a male from another colony was introduced (La Haye et al 2012a, L. Heimann pers.…”
Section: Fragmentation Of the Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phylogeography of continental species was partly included in the reviews of Stewart et al (2010) and Varga (2010), but mostly on the basis of chorological data, making the steppededicated parts of the above papers more thought-provoking than reviewing. The general disregard for continental elements in reviews about the phylogeography of European species could be explained by the relatively recent arrival of studies on this group (with the Table 1 Steppic species examined in the meta-analysis with their systematic affiliation, references of papers reviewed, molecular markers used and range covered in these Gvozdik et al (2012), Zinenko et al (2015) seq ( Neumann et al (2004Neumann et al ( , 2005, Banaszek et al (2010Banaszek et al ( , 2011Banaszek et al ( , 2012, Schroeder et al (2014) seq (mtDNA), msats AT,CZ,DE,HU,PL,RO,RU,SK,UA…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total 51 museum specimens from the museums of natural history in Leiden (Naturalis, the Netherlands) and Brussels (KBIN, Belgium) were sampled, but only 33 samples provided sufficient enough DNA for PCR amplification. The technical analysis of museum and current samples is described in detail in Neumann and Jansman (2004). All genotyping was done by the second author at the Institute of Zoology of the Martin-Luther University in Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.…”
Section: Samples and Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in order to select appropriate donor populations it is necessary to measure the gene diversity and differentiation of potential donor populations. The genetic spatial structure of the Common hamster in Europe and the gene diversity of western European populations has been previously analysed in Neumann et al (2004) and Neumann et al (2005), showing that gene diversity of European hamster populations has been caused by repeated range expansions from eastern refugia. The populations from Belgium, the Netherlands, France and Germany belong to the 'Northern' group, whereas populations from Czech republic and Hungary belong to the 'Southern' group Pannonia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation