2004
DOI: 10.1525/eth.2004.32.4.538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Caretaking of Infants and Young Children: An Area in Critical Need of a Feminist Psychological Anthropology

Abstract: Multiple caretaking of infants and young children, although nearly universal, remains controversial in the United States. Why? This article addresses that question by first reviewing some of the pertinent cross‐cultural record on multiple child care and then by drawing on my own and others' research in India as a case study. The article critiques some of the Western developmental and psychoanalytic assumptions that underlie beliefs that exclusive mothering is essential to a child's well‐being and argues that a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some notable recent works on the theme of relational or collectivist versus individualist modes of personhood include Gammeltoft (, 7–28, 225–35); Glaskin (); Ikeuchi (); Manago and Greenfield (); Sahlins (, 10–15); and Seymour (); among many others. Lamb () is one earlier piece examining competing relational and individualist notions of personhood in anthropological studies of South Asia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some notable recent works on the theme of relational or collectivist versus individualist modes of personhood include Gammeltoft (, 7–28, 225–35); Glaskin (); Ikeuchi (); Manago and Greenfield (); Sahlins (, 10–15); and Seymour (); among many others. Lamb () is one earlier piece examining competing relational and individualist notions of personhood in anthropological studies of South Asia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These children describe themselves as having “multiple mamás” (multiple mothers), including their grandmother caregivers, but also their aunts and other female kin who play an important role in their lives (see, e.g. Seymour ). If migrant imaginaries are formed out of experiences of loss, separation, and distance (Schmidt Camacho ), children reestablish new emotional connections that change the meaning of “family” and their subjective experiences of family relationships over time (Fog Olwig ).…”
Section: Living With Multiple Mamásmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still frequently absent in contemporary studies of children's development is attention to the mutual influences among the multiple and diverse social contexts that form children's life conditions (Lewis and Watson-Gegeo 2004;Seymour 2004;cf. Brison 2009;Fong 2007).…”
Section: Bridging Feminist Family Research Childhood Research and Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent Ethos article Susan Seymour (2004) draws on examples of multiple child care practices to challenge Western theories of child development that uphold exclusive mothering as essential to a child's well-being. She is one of several scholars who in recent decades have criticized how the mother-child relationship is typically foregrounded in research as the single most important relationship in the child's life and shown that this focus overshadows other relationships constitutive of both child development and family (see also Burman 1994;Haavind 1987;James et al 1998;Thorne 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%