2020
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2019.2958838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Delay and Sum With Enveloping Beamforming Algorithm for Photoacoustic Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This evaluation index can test the spectral crosstalk in reconstructed image for the linear algorithm. For nonlinear reconstruction methods or image enhancement methods (such as multiply DAS [54] , [55] or neural network post-processing methods [56] ), the influence of nonlinear algorithms on the spectra can be tested at the same time. For the BP algorithm, there are some modified methods that can reduce the impact of one type of spectral crosstalk (caused by streak artifacts), but these methods have unavoidable tradeoff and should be used with care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evaluation index can test the spectral crosstalk in reconstructed image for the linear algorithm. For nonlinear reconstruction methods or image enhancement methods (such as multiply DAS [54] , [55] or neural network post-processing methods [56] ), the influence of nonlinear algorithms on the spectra can be tested at the same time. For the BP algorithm, there are some modified methods that can reduce the impact of one type of spectral crosstalk (caused by streak artifacts), but these methods have unavoidable tradeoff and should be used with care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, real-time, 4-cm-deep DAS, delay-multiply-and-sum (DMAS), DAS + CF, or DMAS + CF imaging was achieved with processing times of 7.5, 7.6, 11.1, or 11.3 ms, respectively (with the exclusion of memory transfer times between the GPU and CPU). 43 A variation of DMAS, namely the multiple DAS with enveloping beamformer, was implemented on a Quadro P5000 GPU to reconstruct images in 41.62 ms. 74 Another version of DMAS, proposed by Miri Rostami et al., 75 reported a 12-ms processing time for images of size . The reported GPU-SLSC frame rate is better than that achieved with these beamformers and with a parallel backprojection algorithm reporting 17-Hz frame rates when reconstructing duplex images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reconstruction with these two scanning schemes, the back-projection method or its variants are mostly used for their computational efficiency, robustness, and flexibility for arbitrary detector distributions. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] However, most of these algorithms model the ultrasound transducer as a point detector, while in current practice the ultrasound transducers are usually planar with a size of several millimeters. 20,21 The model mismatch between the reconstruction algorithm and the finite sized transducer results in an extended lateral resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have the advantage to access larger views around the target, which helps to give a more complete target structure in the reconstruction results. For the reconstruction with these two scanning schemes, the back‐projection method or its variants are mostly used for their computational efficiency, robustness, and flexibility for arbitrary detector distributions 13‐19 . However, most of these algorithms model the ultrasound transducer as a point detector, while in current practice the ultrasound transducers are usually planar with a size of several millimeters 20,21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%