Multiple Deprivation and Urban Development in Athens, Greece: Spatial Trends and the Role of Access to Housing

Abstract

This paper presents the spatial distribution of multiple deprivation in Athens, and links these spatial patterns to the city’s urban development trajectory and the way housing is accessed. Multiple deprivation was measured as the combined concentration of disadvantageous employment situation, access to education and housing conditions. A principal components analysis was utilized for 20 variables from the three said domains. Two components were identified as statistically significant. The analysis covered approximately 3000 urban spatial analysis units (URANU), using data from the population censuses of 1991, 2001 and 2011. The findings unveil that from 1991 to 2011, multiple deprivation in the urban periphery as well as in city center areas worsened. Conditions in many (but not all) working-class areas in the west of Athens, as well as in middle class suburbs in the east, improved or did not get worse. If compared to the urban development trajectory of the city, this distribution means that the historical East–West socio-economic division is getting less pronounced, whereas an important center–periphery dynamic is emerging. The filtering and sorting process of the housing market could explain those trends. It appears that the most affected populations are those outside the Greek family-centered and homeownership-based model of access to housing.

Urban Quality of Life: Spatial Modeling and Indexing in Athens Metropolitan Area, Greece

“…It was part of the Greek post-war model of economic accumulation in which a comprehensive long-term development strategy was not outlined. The consequence of this situation was the prevalence of short-term economic growth criteria, which in turn undermined socially rational and at the same time sustainable urban development [82].…”

Exploring Spatial Proximity and Social Exclusion through Two Case Studies of Roma Settlements in Greece

“…The mapping of deprivation in Figure 2 is based on the methodology published in Karadimitriou et al [39], analyzing the evolution of deprivation in Athens since the 1990s and in Karadimitirou and Spyrellis [40], comparing deprivation in the six largest Greek cities. The computation of the GDI, for the needs of this paper, takes into account three general domains (employment, education, and housing).…”

Spatial Distribution and Quality of Urban Public Spaces in the Attica Region (Greece) during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey-Based Analysis

“…This sprawling procedure widened the boundaries of "traditional" metropolitan Athens, being strongly connected to the infrastructures developed before the Olympic Games of 2004 [46]. The steady relocation of the Greek middle and higher social classes from built-up areas in the city center and surrounding areas, which began in the 1970s, was the other side of this urban growth trajectory [47]. Negative effects on the quality of life in Athens, especially in the decaying city center, have been a source of public concern since at least the 1980s.…”

“…The 1985 Athens Master Plan increased the attention on these issues [48]. Although the city's population had stopped growing by that time, the effort to promote a more decentralized urban structure was also a key issue in the revision of this plan in 1992, but this did not stop the continued growth of the urban fabric outwards [47]. Many inner-city neighborhoods, whose populations, rents, and prices had declined, provided relatively affordable housing options to successive waves of economic migrants who entered the country in the early 1990s after the fall of the Soviet Union, and then from African and Asian countries in the decade of 2000 [38].…”