Multiple dimensions of biodiversity drive human interest in tide pool communities

Abstract

Activities involving observation of wild organisms (e.g. wildlife watching, tidepooling) can provide recreational and learning opportunities, with biologically diverse animal assemblages expected to be more stimulating to humans. In turn, more diverse communities may enhance human interest and facilitate provisioning of cultural services. However, no experimental tests of this biodiversity-interest hypothesis exist to date. We therefore investigated the effects of different dimensions of animal biodiversity (species richness, phyletic richness and functional diversity) on self-reported interest using tide pools as a model system. We performed two experiments by manipulating: (1) the richness of lower (species) and higher taxonomic levels (phyla) in an image based, online survey, and (2) the richness of the higher taxonomic level (phyla) in live public exhibits. In both experiments, we further quantified functional diversity, which varied freely, and within the online experiment we also included the hue diversity and colourfulness arising from the combination of organisms and the background scenes. Interest was increased by phyletic richness (both studies), animal species richness (online study) and functional diversity (online study). A structural equation model revealed that functional diversity and colourfulness (of the whole scene) also partially mediated the effects of phyletic richness on interest in the online study. In both studies, the presence of three of four phyla additively increased interest, supporting the importance of multiple, diverse phyla rather than a single particularly interesting phylum. These results provide novel experimental evidence that multiple dimensions of biodiversity enhance human interest and suggest that conservation initiatives that maintain or restore biodiversity will help stimulate interest in ecosystems, facilitating educational and recreational benefits.

Species diversity and composition drive the aesthetic value of coral reef fish assemblages

“…Overall, our study provides experimental evidence that the relationship between diversity and human preference is more complex that previously stated (e.g. [10,[11][12][13]). While all previous studies found a positive effect of diversity on human preferences, we find a saturating effect of species' richness, a net negative effect of species' abundances and no effect of functional diversity.…”

“…[31]). As shown in Tribot et al [9] and Fairchild et al [13], the characteristics that trigger positive responses seem to be bright and contrasted colour patterns (i.e. Pygoplites diacanthus).…”

“…body size and shape) among species can contribute positively to human perception by increasing the overall perceived complexity (e.g. [10,[11][12][13]). Other facets of biodiversity such as compositional diversity and species' relative abundances might also come into play in human perception (e.g.…”

When One Health Meets the United Nations Ocean Decade: Global Agendas as a Pathway to Promote Collaborative Interdisciplinary Research on Human-Nature Relationships

“… Gittins et al (2021) showed wellbeing gains from time spent in the woods (Actif Woods Wales program) for people with a range of health and social vulnerabilities. Fairchild et al (2018) examined how greater habitat diversity can play a role in enhancing human interest in conservation, facilitating educational and recreational benefits. This working area focuses on identifying, within the context of both United Kingdom and Brazil, socioeconomic barriers to this human-nature connection which often lead to unequal access to outdoor spaces.…”

Artificial shorelines lack natural structural complexity across scales

“…Although various wider contextual factors may influence the biological communities that can survive on structures (e.g. disturbance [ 31 ] and water quality [ 32 ]), experimental evidence suggests interventions that add structural complexity can increase the abundance and diversity of intertidal species [ 27 ] that in turn may increase their aesthetic value [ 33 ]. There may be scenarios where a lack of colonization is desirable on coastal structures when ‘fouling’, particularly by non-native species, is considered problematic [ 34 ].…”