Background and purpose
Randomized clinical trials involving anti‐amyloid interventions focus on the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) with proven amyloid pathology, using amyloid positron emission tomography (amyloid‐PET) imaging or cerebrospinal fluid analysis. However, these investigations are either expensive or invasive and are not readily available in resource‐limited centres. Hence, the identification of cost‐effective clinical alternatives to amyloid‐PET is highly desirable. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of combined clinical markers in predicting amyloid‐PET status in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) individuals.
Methods
In all, 406 MCI participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database were dichotomized into amyloid‐PET(+) and amyloid‐PET(−) using a cut‐off of >1.11. The accuracies of single clinical markers [apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) genotype, demographics, cognitive measures and cerebrospinal fluid analysis] in predicting amyloid‐PET status were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. A logistic regression model was then used to determine the optimal model with combined clinical markers to predict amyloid‐PET status.
Results
Cerebrospinal fluid amyloid‐β (Aβ) showed the best predictive accuracy of amyloid‐PET status [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.927]. Whilst ApoE4 genotype (AUC = 0.737) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale – Cognitive Subscale (ADAS‐Cog) 13 (AUC = 0.724) independently discriminated amyloid‐PET(+) and amyloid‐PET(−) MCI individuals, the combination of clinical markers (ApoE4 carrier, age >60 years and ADAS‐Cog 13 > 13.5) improved the predictive accuracy of amyloid‐PET status (AUC = 0.827, P < 0.001).
Conclusions
Cerebrospinal fluid Aβ, which is an invasive procedure, is most accurate in predicting amyloid‐PET status in MCI individuals. The combination of ApoE4, age and ADAS‐Cog 13 also accurately predicts amyloid‐PET status. As this combination of clinical markers is cheap, non‐invasive and readily available, it offers an attractive surrogate assessment for amyloid status amongst MCI individuals in resource‐limited settings.