“…Such comparison of configurations can be done by comparing the sample configurations from the two sessions and, additionally, by means of multiblock data analysis, such as Generalized Procrustes Analysis (Arnold, 1986;Arnold & Williams, 1986;Gower, 1975), STATIS (Lavit, Escoufier, Sabatier, & Traissac, 1994), or MFA (Escofier & Pagès, 1994, 1998Pagès, 2013). Since the input tables in CATA tasks are contingency tables (here, one contingency table crossing the products in rows and the terms in columns is obtained for each session), one suitable solution to analyse the data consists in performing MFACT (Bécue-Bertaut & Pagès, 2004;Kostov et al, 2013). This analysis aims at balancing each group in the analysis by performing Correspondence Analysis (CA; Husson, Lê, & Pagès, 2011) on each separate group (a contingency table).…”