2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2010.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple prey effects: Agonistic behaviors between prey species enhances consumption by their shared predator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We manipulated the size and therefore the palatability of the species in the resource community to investigate these mechanisms. However, other properties such as nutrition (Sterner et al 1993), chemical (DeMott 1999 and mechanical defenses, infochemicals (Vos et al 2001), and behavior (Toscano et al 2010) may also influence the palatability of resource species and therefore rates of consumption in diverse communities. We expect that incorporating these properties and mechanisms into food web models will improve our understanding of complex community dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We manipulated the size and therefore the palatability of the species in the resource community to investigate these mechanisms. However, other properties such as nutrition (Sterner et al 1993), chemical (DeMott 1999 and mechanical defenses, infochemicals (Vos et al 2001), and behavior (Toscano et al 2010) may also influence the palatability of resource species and therefore rates of consumption in diverse communities. We expect that incorporating these properties and mechanisms into food web models will improve our understanding of complex community dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have rarely separated consumption effects from population responses, and so the relative importance of each has not yet been elucidated (Edwards et al 2009). Among the few direct tests of the influence of resource species diversity on rates of consumption, neutral effects (DeMott 1998), positive effects (Pfisterer et al 2003, Toscano et al 2010, and negative effects (DeMott 1999, Kratina et al 2007, Wyckmans et al 2007) have been demonstrated. The variability in the effect of resource diversity likely stems from the importance of the palatability of the resource species in the community and the feeding selectivity of the consumer (suggested in Duffy 2002, Thebault and Loreau 2005, Jactel and Brockerhoff 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hundreds of studies over more than two decades document various types of TMII, including top down effects in linear interaction chains (e.g., Wissinger and McGrady 1993), bottom up effects in linear interaction chains (e.g., Anholt and Werner 1995), interactions with multiple predators that share the same prey (Sih et al 1998), interactions with multiple prey that share the same predator (e.g., Toscano et al 2010), and numerous other more complex interaction webs (Werner and Peacor 2003). Reviews of these TMII and their roles in ecological communities have concluded that they are pervasive and that they provide an important community-structuring force, with effects equivalent to, if not greater than, indirect interactions transmitted through changes in density (Bolker et al 2003, Werner and Peacor 2003, Schmitz et al 2004, Luttbeg and Kerby 2005, Preisser et al 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This application of the substitutive design is analogous to that in species richness studies that alter the number of species while maintaining a constant overall density of individuals (e.g. Griffin et al 2008, Toscano et al 2010.We determined densities of each size class that are equivalent in total energy demand using a power-law metabolic rate model where the total energy demand of a population (T ) of mean body size (W ) is a function of the metabolic rate (I) of individuals times the number of individuals (N ) (Brown et al 2004, Chalcraft & Resetarits 2004:Metabolic rate (I) scales as a power-law function of body size with a scaling exponent of roughly 0.75 (Leffler 1973, Brown et al 2004. Thus, populations i and j of densities N and mean body sizes W have an equivalent total energy demand when the following equality is satisfied (Chalcraft & Resetarits 2004): (2) This energetic equivalence rule predicts that populations of equivalent total energy demand will have similar impacts on ecological processes related to metabolic rate (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%