2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple sclerosis lesion detection in multimodal MRI using simple clustering-based segmentation and classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With numerous neoteric deep learning models, Ozdemir et al, pointed out the conventional method of detection of MS lesions. In [14], the supervised learning of the minimum Euclidean distancebased algorithm had a step ahead in performance criteria. This accounts for a light-weight automated model for the detection of lesions in MR images.…”
Section: Summary Of Previous Work On Ms Lesion Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With numerous neoteric deep learning models, Ozdemir et al, pointed out the conventional method of detection of MS lesions. In [14], the supervised learning of the minimum Euclidean distancebased algorithm had a step ahead in performance criteria. This accounts for a light-weight automated model for the detection of lesions in MR images.…”
Section: Summary Of Previous Work On Ms Lesion Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This accounts for a light-weight automated model for the detection of lesions in MR images. The work in [14] was relayed mainly using three 2D-MRI protocols, T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR modalities.…”
Section: Summary Of Previous Work On Ms Lesion Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study done by Cetina et al, 28 aimed to improve a new, robust, and simplified images dividing technique to make MS-lesions quantitative analysis from multi-modal MRI data, stated that the advanced method categorizes several brain tissues and recolonizes MS lesion with over 90 percent specificity& accuracy, and average sensitivity ranging between 62-65 %.…”
Section: Thirty Cases With Rrms Have Been Enrolled In the Current Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To advance the efficiency and accuracy of the medical diagnostic system, especially those that are distributed in complex areas (e.g., brain, skin, lung, and blood cancer classification), several live line diagnostic models (Bengio et al [ 1 ]; Tiwari et al [ 2 ]; Bhatt et al [ 3 ]) work with image processing. The effectiveness of the detection and accuracy of the multidisciplinary medical data diagnostic system depends largely on the quality of the included images captured by a few techniques (Cetin et al [ 4 ]) such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for brain data analysis, dermoscopic for skin, microscopic for blood leukemia, computed tomography (CT) scan images for lungs, etc. However, due to the uncontrollable lighting conditions and lots of noise availability during capturing, the illumination distributed on the surface of the medical images remains uneven, especially when backlight or fixed lighting conditions affect the diagnostic model (Bonabeau et al [ 5 ]; Banks et al [ 6 ]; Siva Raja and Rani [ 7 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%