2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2016.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple sequence alignment using multi-objective based bacterial foraging optimization algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last few years, the BFO algorithm has been successfully applied to solve real-world engineering optimization problems [38]. It has been pointed out that the BFO algorithm can reduce the global convergence, computational burden, time and also handle a number of objective functions [39]. Comparisons with the conventional intelligent evolutionary computation algorithms, such as the Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), have shown that BFO can realize a better optimization performance in many practical problems and real applications [40][41][42].…”
Section: Bfo Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, the BFO algorithm has been successfully applied to solve real-world engineering optimization problems [38]. It has been pointed out that the BFO algorithm can reduce the global convergence, computational burden, time and also handle a number of objective functions [39]. Comparisons with the conventional intelligent evolutionary computation algorithms, such as the Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), have shown that BFO can realize a better optimization performance in many practical problems and real applications [40][41][42].…”
Section: Bfo Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ranjani Rani, Dr. D. Ramyachitra [19]proposed a hybrid algorithm called Multi-Objective Bacterial Foraging Optimization Algorithm (MO-BFO) for solving Multiple sequence alignment problems. The proposed work consists of two algorithms, the first algorithm is Hybrid Genetic Algorithm with Artificial Bee Colony (GA-ABC), while the second is the Bacterial Foraging Optimization Algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the disadvantage of this algorithm is GPU-based and cannot be employed by CPUbased computers. The primary drawbacks of the previous related works [19][20] [21] and the others that introduced in the Introduction are they require more memory allocation and time-consuming. While the proposed work requires less memory size and CPU computing time due to reducing the alignment search space at matching Region process and due to the paralleling of the alignment space with the Genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Rani et al proposed in [21] two algorithms, the Hybrid Genetic Algorithm with Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm (GA-ABC) and the Bacterial Foraging Optimization Algorithm (MO-BFO), but in their work they focused mainly on MO-BFO algorithm because it performed better and it also identified conserved blocks. They incorporate in their work four objectives to optimize: maximization of similarity, non-gap percentage, conserved blocks, and minimization of gap penalty.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%