2014
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.12480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Shape Correspondence by Dynamic Programming

Abstract: We present a multiple shape correspondence method based on dynamic programming, that computes consistent bijective maps between all shape pairs in a given collection of initially unmatched shapes. As a fundamental distinction from previous work, our method aims to explicitly minimize the overall distortion, i.e., the average isometric distortion of the resulting maps over all shape pairs. We cast the problem as optimal path finding on a graph structure where vertices are maps between shape extremities. We expl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Matching semantically similar shapes is a problem studied in deep depth for various scenarios including completely isometric shape pairs [OMMG10] [SY13], partially isometric shape pairs [SY14b] [LRB * 16], non-isometric shape pairs [PBDSH13] [SPKS16], and a collection of shapes [CRA * 16] [SY14a]. Compared to these studies, and many other related ones [vKZHCO11], matching shapes under noise, especially topological noise, is a problem that is yet at its infancy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matching semantically similar shapes is a problem studied in deep depth for various scenarios including completely isometric shape pairs [OMMG10] [SY13], partially isometric shape pairs [SY14b] [LRB * 16], non-isometric shape pairs [PBDSH13] [SPKS16], and a collection of shapes [CRA * 16] [SY14a]. Compared to these studies, and many other related ones [vKZHCO11], matching shapes under noise, especially topological noise, is a problem that is yet at its infancy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[RBA* 12] relaxed the regularity requirement by allowing sparse correspondences and introduced a mechanism to explicitly control the degree of sparsity of the solution [RTH* 13]. Sahillioğlu and Yemez [SY14] used a voting approach to match shape extremities, assuming them to be preserved by the partiality transformation. The common deficiencies of the above non‐rigid partial correspondence methods are their ability to provide only a sparse correspondence (typically, order of tens of points), high computational complexity, and inability to deal with extreme partiality where boundary effects play a significant role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple shape correspondence in the rigid settings has been addressed in numerous works, including [HFG*06, TRA11, LBB12]. In the non‐rigid setting, pointwise and functional maps for large shape collections have been explored in [HG13, HWG14, SY14a, CRA*16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%