Multiple syntrophic interactions drive biohythane production from waste sludge in microbial electrolysis cells

Abstract

BackgroundBiohythane is a new and high-value transportation fuel present as a mixture of biomethane and biohydrogen. It has been produced from different organic matters using anaerobic digestion. Bioenergy can be recovered from waste activated sludge through methane production during anaerobic digestion, but energy yield is often insufficient to sludge disposal. Microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) is also a promising approach for bioenergy recovery and waste sludge disposal as higher energy efficiency and biogas production. The systematic understanding of microbial interactions and biohythane production in MEC is still limited. Here, we report biohythane production from waste sludge in biocathode microbial electrolysis cells and reveal syntrophic interactions in microbial communities based on high-throughput sequencing and quantitative PCR targeting 16S rRNA gene.ResultsThe alkali-pretreated sludge fed MECs (AS-MEC) showed the highest biohythane production rate of 0.148 L·L−1-reactor·day−1, which is 40 and 80 % higher than raw sludge fed MECs (RS-MEC) and anaerobic digestion (open circuit MEC, RS-OCMEC). Current density, metabolite profiles, and hydrogen-methane ratio results all confirm that alkali-pretreatment and microbial electrolysis greatly enhanced sludge hydrolysis and biohythane production. Illumina Miseq sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons indicates that anode biofilm was dominated by exoelectrogenic Geobacter, fermentative bacteria and hydrogen-producing bacteria in the AS-MEC. The cathode biofilm was dominated by fermentative Clostridium. The dominant archaeal populations on the cathodes of AS-MEC and RS-MEC were affiliated with hydrogenotrophic Methanobacterium (98 %, relative abundance) and Methanocorpusculum (77 %), respectively. Multiple pathways of gas production were observed in the same MEC reactor, including fermentative and electrolytic H2 production, as well as hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis and electromethanogenesis. Real-time quantitative PCR analyses showed that higher amount of methanogens were enriched in AS-MEC than that in RS-MEC and RS-OCMEC, suggesting that alkali-pretreated sludge and MEC facilitated hydrogenotrophic methanogen enrichment.ConclusionThis study proves for the first time that biohythane could be produced directly in biocathode MECs using waste sludge. MEC and alkali-pretreatment accelerated enrichment of hydrogenotrophic methanogen and hydrolysis of waste sludge. The results indicate syntrophic interactions among fermentative bacteria, exoelectrogenic bacteria and methanogenic archaea in MECs are critical for highly efficient conversion of complex organics into biohythane, demonstrating that MECs can be more competitive than conventional anaerobic digestion for biohythane production using carbohydrate-deficient substrates. Biohythane production from waste sludge by MEC provides a promising new way for practical application of microbial electrochemical technology.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13068-016-0579-x) contai...

Platinum Group Metal–free Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Microbial Electrolysis Cells

“…Because MECs are constantly exposed to wastewater, mixed‐culture biocathode is easier to maintain and economically more viable than pure‐culture biocathode. Mixed‐culture biocathode has been found dominated by Deltaproteobacteria such as Desulfovibrio and Geobacter ,,, in agreement with the previous discussions that these organisms play important roles in HER catalysis. In addition to Proteobacteria, Firmicutes are commonly found in MEC biocathode (Figure ) and are possibly contributing to electron uptake from the electrode and even proton reduction ,.…”

“…As a consequence of the favorable micro‐environment, CH 4 can account for 86 % of the total biogas . Instead of inhibiting methane production, recent studies used MECs to produce biohythane, an emerging fuel composed of biomethane and 5–10 % biohydrogen . The MEC produced biohythane 80 % faster than an anaerobic digester due to the multiple pathways of biogas production, including fermentative and electrolytic hydrogen production, as well as hydrogenotrophic and electrochemical methanogenesis.…”

“… Microbial community taxonomic wind‐rose plots based on relative abundance of 16S rRNA sequences of sludge and biofilms in MEC at the bacterial phylum (a) and genus levels (b) …”

Glucose and Applied Voltage Accelerated p-Nitrophenol Reduction in Biocathode of Bioelectrochemical Systems

“…The concentrations of PNP and PAP were determined, as previously reported, and the production was analyzed by a high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometer (HPLC-MS) ( Wang et al, 2016 ). We used a gas chromatograph (Agilent, 4890D; J&W Scientific, United States) with a flame ionization detector and an appropriate column (19095N-123HP-INNOWAX, 30 m × 0.530 mm × 1.00 μm, J&W Scientific, United States) to analyze the concentrations of volatile fatty acids (VFAs), including acetic acid, propionic acid, isobutyric acid, butyric acid, isovaleric acid, and valeric acid ( Liu et al, 2016 ). The glucose concentration of the cathode effluent was analyzed with a glucose determination kit (RSBIO, Shanghai).…”

Combined freezing-thawing pretreatment and microbial electrolysis cell for enhancement of highly concentrated organics degradation from dewatered sludge

“…Previous research studies showed that different kinds of substrates including waste biomass could be digested anaerobically in the bioelectrochemical systems (BES) like MFC or MEC [13,20]. However, the complex substrate, such as DS, cannot be directly utilized by exoelectrogens to produce electric current and is usually required participation of different functional groups besides exoelectrogenic bacteria for decomposition [21][22][23]. In fact, the exoelectrogens were able to consume almost all kinds of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) [20,24].…”