2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1512645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple “time step” Monte Carlo

Abstract: We propose a sampling scheme to reduce the CPU time for Monte Carlo simulations of atomic systems. Our method is based on the separation of the potential energy into parts that are expected to vary at different rates as a function of coordinates. We perform n moves that are accepted or rejected according to the rapidly varying part of the potential, and the resulting configuration is accepted or rejected according to the slowly varying part. We test our method on a Lennard-Jones system. We show that use of our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second class of strategies attempts directly to enhance sampling of atomic-resolution models, including multiple time step methods [5,6], replica exchange [7]/parallel tempering [8,9,10], and other generalized ensemble techniques [11]. Parallel tempering (PT), which employs a ladder of replicas simulated at increasing temperatures, is widely used for state-of-the-art molecular dynamics simulations, but presently is limited to small proteins [12], as the resources required increase rapidly with the system size.…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second class of strategies attempts directly to enhance sampling of atomic-resolution models, including multiple time step methods [5,6], replica exchange [7]/parallel tempering [8,9,10], and other generalized ensemble techniques [11]. Parallel tempering (PT), which employs a ladder of replicas simulated at increasing temperatures, is widely used for state-of-the-art molecular dynamics simulations, but presently is limited to small proteins [12], as the resources required increase rapidly with the system size.…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NpT, in a relatively straightforward manner. On the other hand, an efficient sampling of phase space in MC requires smart and system dependent trial moves [30][31][32][33][34] , making the application of the method more intricate than molecular dynamics where configurational sampling follows a general principle. Within the framework of MC, McGrath and coworkers 27 reported the first results from first-principles simulations of liquid water in the isobaric-isothermal ensemble at ambient pressure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expanding this expression gives: (32) where α(j|i) and acc L (j|i) are the selection and acceptance probabilities of outer state j from state i. Following the MTS-MC derivation, 35 the probability of selecting state j from state i is given by the following: (33) where the above transition probability is the product of the individual transition probabilities of the inner loop (34) In the short-range, or inner loop of sampling, neither the switching function nor the Born radii are updated, so that each step obeys the following detailed balance relation: (35) The transition between outer states j and i obeys the following detailed balance relation: (36) Combining eqs 32-35 and solving for the ratio of acceptance probabilities gives the following: (37) Protocols A and B follow the same updating scheme for the switching functions. The acceptance probability for protocol A is expressed in eq 17 as follows: (38) The ratio of eqs 37 and 38 is unity (39) and therefore, the sampling scheme described by eqs 37 and 38 rigorously obeys detailed balance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%