2003
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.41.6.2669-2671.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplex PCR Assay for Identification of Human Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli

Abstract: A multiplex PCR assay for the identification of human diarrheagenic Escherichia coli was developed. The targets selected for each category were eae for enteropathogenic E. coli, stx for Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, elt and est for enterotoxigenic E. coli, ipaH for enteroinvasive E. coli, and aggR for enteroaggregative E. coli. This assay allowed the categorization of a diarrheagenic E. coli strain in a single reaction tube.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
130
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
130
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Strains biochemically identified as E. coli were differentiated as typical or atypical EPEC strains by a PCR-based method. The eae, stx and bfp-A genes were amplified using the primers eae-F (59-CTG-AACGGCGATTACGCGAA-39) and eae-R (59-CCAGACGATACG-ATC-CAG-39), stx-F (59-GAGCGAAATAATTTATATGTG-39) and stx-R (59-TGATGATGGCAATTCAGTAT-39), and bfpA-F (59-AATG-GTGCTTGCGCTTGCTGC-39) and bfpA-R (59-GCCGCTTTATC-CAACCTGGTA-39) (Toma et al, 2003;Aranda et al, 2007). The current study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strains biochemically identified as E. coli were differentiated as typical or atypical EPEC strains by a PCR-based method. The eae, stx and bfp-A genes were amplified using the primers eae-F (59-CTG-AACGGCGATTACGCGAA-39) and eae-R (59-CCAGACGATACG-ATC-CAG-39), stx-F (59-GAGCGAAATAATTTATATGTG-39) and stx-R (59-TGATGATGGCAATTCAGTAT-39), and bfpA-F (59-AATG-GTGCTTGCGCTTGCTGC-39) and bfpA-R (59-GCCGCTTTATC-CAACCTGGTA-39) (Toma et al, 2003;Aranda et al, 2007). The current study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA extracted with a DNeasy TM Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), or boiled enrichment culture was used as templates. Oligonucleotide primers (Table 2) for PCR were as follows: SK1, SK2 for eae (Oswald et al, 2000), Vtcom-u, Vtcomd for stx (Yamasaki et al, 1996), LT L , LT R for elt (Toma et al, 2003), and AL65, AL125c for est (Toma et al, 2003). PCR was performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation for 5 min at 94 C, 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 C, 1 min at 55 C, 1 min at 72 C, and a final extension step of 7 min at 72 C. PCR amplicons were electrophoresed on 2% SeaKem GTG agarose gel (Takara, Otsu, Shiga, Japan) in 13 TAE buffer.…”
Section: Isolation and Identification Of E Colimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El diagnostico de ECD es difícil, para identificarlas correctamente deben diferenciarse de miembros no patógenos de la biota normal, generalmente por determinación de los serotipos, lo cual no es determinante, pues muchas de estas bacterias pueden intercambiar material genético y con ello genes de virulencia, por lo que en los últimos años se ha elegido los métodos moleculares como la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR) para la detección con resultados rápidos, fiables, con alta sensibilidad y especificidad (7,8) basada en la identificación de la presencia de genes de virulencia específicos, que están ausentes en cepas no patógenas (9,10).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified