2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-01002-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplexed direct detection of barcoded protein reporters on a nanopore array

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another strategy to unfold a protein relies on electrostatic pulling force as demonstrated for thioredoxin, which was captured with the help of an oligonucleotide attached to the C-terminus and gradually unfolded and translocated through an α-HL pore via a Brownian ratchet mechanism ( Rodriguez-Larrea and Bayley, 2013 ; Simon et al., 1992 ) ( Figure 3 G). This unfolding through electrostatic pulling was also used to demonstrate the readout of protein expression levels through genetically encoded reporter proteins that are detectable with the commercial ONT sequencing platform, an approach that offers a significantly increased multiplexing potential ( Cardozo et al., 2022 ). Subsequently, ClpX, the unfoldase of the ClpXP unfolding and degradation complex ( Baker and Sauer, 2012 ), was adopted to pull folded proteins through α-HL pores.…”
Section: Sensing Biomedical Relevant Molecules With Biological Nanoporesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strategy to unfold a protein relies on electrostatic pulling force as demonstrated for thioredoxin, which was captured with the help of an oligonucleotide attached to the C-terminus and gradually unfolded and translocated through an α-HL pore via a Brownian ratchet mechanism ( Rodriguez-Larrea and Bayley, 2013 ; Simon et al., 1992 ) ( Figure 3 G). This unfolding through electrostatic pulling was also used to demonstrate the readout of protein expression levels through genetically encoded reporter proteins that are detectable with the commercial ONT sequencing platform, an approach that offers a significantly increased multiplexing potential ( Cardozo et al., 2022 ). Subsequently, ClpX, the unfoldase of the ClpXP unfolding and degradation complex ( Baker and Sauer, 2012 ), was adopted to pull folded proteins through α-HL pores.…”
Section: Sensing Biomedical Relevant Molecules With Biological Nanoporesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 80 A comparison between RFs and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) has recently been conducted. 81 Using either a set of engineered signal features as input to an RF classifier or the raw ionic current signals directly into a CNN, both algorithms are found to achieve similar classification accuracy ranging from 80% to 90%, depending on the hyperparameters and data sets.…”
Section: Ml-based Signal Processing For Nanopore Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar classifier is used in bacterial shape discrimination and for label-free electrical diagnostics of influenza to distinguish among individual viruses by their distinct features from the same group. , Recently, RoF and RF-based classifiers have been developed to identify four kinds of coronal viruses according to the features of translocation spikes, even when they have highly similar size and shape . A comparison between RFs and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) has recently been conducted . Using either a set of engineered signal features as input to an RF classifier or the raw ionic current signals directly into a CNN, both algorithms are found to achieve similar classification accuracy ranging from 80% to 90%, depending on the hyperparameters and data sets.…”
Section: Ml-based Signal Processing For Nanopore Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nanopore ionic current signal would then be dependent on the sequence of the strand immobilized within the pore 17 . To verify this approach, we tested biotin-modified DNA strands in the presence of streptavidin on a MinION nanopore sensor array using a custom run script that briefly reversed the applied voltage across the nanopore array every ten seconds, allowing us to repeatedly capture strands from the bulk solution and then eject them electrophoretically 30 . Repeatedly sampling strands from the bulk flow cell solution in this manner allowed us to detect DNA-specific nanopore capture events at a concentration-dependent frequency (Fig.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nanopore data analysis pipeline is adapted from Cardozo et al 30 and begins by isolating capture events from raw nanopore current. A capture event occurs when the nanopore current drops to 70% or below of its open pore level for longer than one millisecond.…”
Section: Nanopore Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%