2014
DOI: 10.1021/pr500317d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplexed MRM with Internal Standards for Cerebrospinal Fluid Candidate Protein Biomarker Quantitation

Abstract: Multiplexed quantitation is essential for discovering, verifying, and validating biomarkers for risk stratification, disease prognostication, and therapeutic monitoring. The most promising strategy for quantifying unverified protein biomarkers in biofluids relies on selected/multiple reaction monitoring (SRM or MRM) technology with isotopically labeled standards employed within a bottom-up proteomic workflow. Since cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an important fluid for studying central nervous system (CNS) relate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5A shows that the intra-assay precision was excellent as Ͼ97% of peptide targets had a CV Ͻ20% and the average CV ranged between 6.2-7.7% for these six biological samples. These intra-assay precision values are similar to highly multiplexed LC/ MRM-MS assays that we have previously developed for protein quantification, such as in plasma (average 6.9% CV) and in cerebrospinal fluid (average 5.8% CV) (33,55). Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5A shows that the intra-assay precision was excellent as Ͼ97% of peptide targets had a CV Ͻ20% and the average CV ranged between 6.2-7.7% for these six biological samples. These intra-assay precision values are similar to highly multiplexed LC/ MRM-MS assays that we have previously developed for protein quantification, such as in plasma (average 6.9% CV) and in cerebrospinal fluid (average 5.8% CV) (33,55). Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The average protein concentration fold-change between pairs of peptides was 2.8 and a histogram of these values is included as supplemental S1. Similar discrepancies for protein concentrations calculated from multiple peptides have commonly been reported in biofluids and cell cultures when using peptide-level internal standards (31,33,34,48,49), and it is generally accepted that the main source of divergence is incomplete trypsin digestion (50,51). One potential solution to this fundamental challenge in all bottom-up proteomic experiments is the use of fulllength SIS proteins that could be spiked into the sample to account for digestion efficiency (52).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In our laboratory, it is our current practice to quantify proteins in a control sample from standard curves using constant NAT and variable SIS peptide concentrations across a minimum of 6 levels, as demonstrated in our recent methods for alternative biofluids (i.e., cerebrospinal fluid [43] and plasma [39]). This approach was used again here with 8 levels (spanning a 9000-fold SIS concentration range) used in the quantitative method development and 6 levels (spanning a 360-fold range) used in the subsequent application to urine from prostate cancer (PC) patients.…”
Section: Intra-/inter-assay Precision and Peptide Quantifier/qualifiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to interest in biofluids with less‐invasive collection methods, such as urine and saliva . Although its collection is even more invasive than plasma, cerebrospinal fluid may still be the best option for biomarkers of brain‐related diseases . Multiplexed MRM assays for animal models of human diseases, such as the mouse, have also been developed for use in medical research …”
Section: ‘Absolute’ Quantitation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%