[1991] Conference Record of the Twenty-Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems &Amp; Computers
DOI: 10.1109/acssc.1991.186449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiply-constrained MVDR matched field processing with a-posteriori constraints for enhanced robustness to mismatch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, we normalize it and express it as 10 log10(κ2/M)0 dB [43]. The WNC process is a better choice for baseline comparison because it has been shown in many articles that the MVDR has a better resolution than Bartlett MFP, but it is sensitive to environmental/system mismatch and needs enough snapshots to make trueK^Y full rank [2,3,5].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In practice, we normalize it and express it as 10 log10(κ2/M)0 dB [43]. The WNC process is a better choice for baseline comparison because it has been shown in many articles that the MVDR has a better resolution than Bartlett MFP, but it is sensitive to environmental/system mismatch and needs enough snapshots to make trueK^Y full rank [2,3,5].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, conventional (Bartlett) MFP is relatively robust, however suffering from some fundamental limitations such as low resolution and a high side lobe level. On the other hand, methods such as Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) offer a high resolution and low side lobe level [4,5], however often showing significant sensitivity to environmental/system mismatch; hence, when the assumed and true models differ [6,7], the methods frequently give biased estimates [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%