1989
DOI: 10.1109/8.18700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiport network approach for modeling the mutual coupling effects in microstrip patch antennas and arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the return losses for these elements are still different. Therefore, in the final array design, elements 1 and 2 as well as their symmetrical counterparts (elements 19 and 18, respectively) should be treated differently from the interior or inner elements (elements [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: A a 1 â 19 Linear Phased Array Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, the return losses for these elements are still different. Therefore, in the final array design, elements 1 and 2 as well as their symmetrical counterparts (elements 19 and 18, respectively) should be treated differently from the interior or inner elements (elements [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: A a 1 â 19 Linear Phased Array Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equivalent source method has been used for calculating the mutual coupling between discontinuities in planar circuits [1][2][3]. When it comes to a large but finite-extent antenna array, there are two main methods for modeling mutual coupling, namely the spatial domain (element-byelement) method and the spectral domain (periodic cell) method [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the rnultiport network model allows us to incorporate the effect of mutual coupling among different edges of a patch or among patches of an array [17] by defining a mutual coupling network (MCN). The edge admittance terms associated with various ports at the edges constitute the diagonal terms of the admittance matrix for the MCN.…”
Section: Modeling Of Mutual Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, if a given patch is affected by N adjacent elements, the ports of the relevant MCN will be connected to all these patches. In particular, where thin substrates without dielectric cover layer are adopted (this is actually the assumption in the presented study), the elements of the Y -matrix characterizing MCN networks can be easily obtained from the reaction between the equivalent magnetic current sources at the corresponding sections of the edges of interacting patches, as discussed in [14].…”
Section: Multiport Network Modeling Of the Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the initial array element locations and excitation distributions useful to mimic a given radiation pattern can be determined analytically while addressing design constraints relevant to the minimum antenna spacing, array aperture, and maximum number of power levels to be operated in the array beam-forming network. The obtained array configuration is afterwards processed within a dedicated Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm [8][9][10][11][12] in combination with a multiport network approach [13,14] for computationally efficient modeling of the parasitic mutual coupling between the antenna elements. Along these lines, an enhancement of the convergence in terms of the number of iterations within the metaheuristic procedure and, consequently, a reduction of the total computational time required to obtain a converged solution of problem can be achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%