Structural Interdependence and Economic Development 1963
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-81634-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiregional Input-Output Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0
12

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
105
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…where I is the identity matrix, and (I − A) −1 is the Leontief inverse, which includes all direct and indirect impacts between different economic sectors and, thus, counts the total impact across all supply chains (Leontief [32,33]). The fundamental IO theory was extended to include physical indicators such as any economic stimulus and water consumption.…”
Section: Water Consumption Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where I is the identity matrix, and (I − A) −1 is the Leontief inverse, which includes all direct and indirect impacts between different economic sectors and, thus, counts the total impact across all supply chains (Leontief [32,33]). The fundamental IO theory was extended to include physical indicators such as any economic stimulus and water consumption.…”
Section: Water Consumption Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wilson (1970) a souligné que cette façon de représenter la structure inputoutput des régions est caractéristique du modèle de Léontief et Strout (1963). L'hypothèse de base de cette approche est que la destination ultime des biens est indifférente aux producteurs, et leur origine est indifférente aux consommateurs.…”
Section: Les Contraintes Intersectorielles Régionalesunclassified
“…Léontief et Strout (1963) ont proposé une version gravitaire du modèle inputoutput interrégional, qui tenait compte de la distance entre les régions, sans pour autant permettre de substitution sur la base de changement des coûts de transport. Wilson (1970) récrit ce modèle sous la forme d'un programme mathématique, où la fonction objectif de type entropique à maximiser est assujettie à des contraintes comptables input-output par région et à des contraintes sur les dépenses totales de transport par produit.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Soon thereafter, Leontief and Strout (1963) presented a form of the gravity trade model which can be readily implemented for multiregional trade analysis. Compared with the more extensive data on transportation costs required for a linear programming transportation model, only a limited amount of data is needed to implement the Leontief-Strout gravity trade model (hereafter referred to as the LSG model).…”
Section: The Classical Combinatorial Approach: Multiregional Gravity mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic data include: technical input-output coefficients, preferably for each region; final demands for each region; and trade coefficients which reflect the costs of shipping a commodity from one region to another. The summary presented here is taken mostly from Polenske (1970) and Batten (1983); a more complete description may be found in Leontief and Strout (1963).…”
Section: The Classical Combinatorial Approach: Multiregional Gravity mentioning
confidence: 99%