1994
DOI: 10.1021/jf00048a027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiresidue Procedures for the Determination of Pesticides in Food Using Capillary Gas Chromatographic, Flame Photometric, and Mass Spectrometric Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Chromatographic methods are the most suitable for residue analysis [3][4][5][6] in GC using long, narrow-bore capillary columns equipped with selective and sensitive detection methods such as electrophilic conductivity detector (ECD) [7,8], nitrogen-phosphorus detector (NPD) [9,10] and flame photometric detector (FPD) [11,12] according to different classes of pesticides. An emerging strategy in multiresidue methodology is the search for universal detection systems, e. g., in GC coupled with mass-selective detectors [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromatographic methods are the most suitable for residue analysis [3][4][5][6] in GC using long, narrow-bore capillary columns equipped with selective and sensitive detection methods such as electrophilic conductivity detector (ECD) [7,8], nitrogen-phosphorus detector (NPD) [9,10] and flame photometric detector (FPD) [11,12] according to different classes of pesticides. An emerging strategy in multiresidue methodology is the search for universal detection systems, e. g., in GC coupled with mass-selective detectors [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, many non-fatty matrices are identified as tending to give matrix effects, such as apple, tomato, banana, orange peel, stone fruits, carrot, leafy vegetables, wheat, wine etc. (Miyahara et al, 1994;Egea González et al, 2002;Navarro et al, 2002;Patel et al, 2004;Georgakopoulos et al, 2007;Freitas & Lanças, 2009), due to the high co-extracts amount persisting in the GC analytical sample, necessitating the application of clean-up step(s) (Dorea et al, 1996;Hajšlová et al, 1998;Schenck & Lehotay, 2000;Li et al, 2008). It should also be addressed that matrix effects are difficult to study because of the different analysis conditions for the samples, since the effects of simple maintenance application (e.g.…”
Section: Matrix-induced Enhancement Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the analytical method involves the following stages: sampling, sample preparation, extraction, detection and data analysis, where the sample preparation could be considered a critical step. The official multiresidue pesticide methods recommend extraction of the pesticides with organic solvents, 8 clean-up by column chromatography 4,9,10 or gel permeation chromatography 8,11 and quantification by capillary GC-MS. [12][13][14] Since the recommended extraction procedure requires large quantities of toxic solvents, other extraction procedures have been reported, including, solid-phase extraction, 9,10,15,16 supercritical fluid extraction 17 and microwave assisted extraction coupled to solid phase microextraction. 18 With relation to current Brazilian legislation, which regulates the registration of phytopharmaceuticals, the determination of pesticides has not been included in the purity assay of herbal plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%