2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiresolution analysis for material design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between the mechanical properties of elastic networks on a macroscopic level and the details of their microstructures are the key to optimization and design of lightweight, strong and tough materials [14]. The continuum modelling of such discrete structures has a long history, going as far back as the pioneering work of Cauchy & Poisson [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between the mechanical properties of elastic networks on a macroscopic level and the details of their microstructures are the key to optimization and design of lightweight, strong and tough materials [14]. The continuum modelling of such discrete structures has a long history, going as far back as the pioneering work of Cauchy & Poisson [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal virtual power is decomposed into a homogeneous and inhomogeneous part (McVeigh et al, 2006;Vernerey et al, 2009). We assume that during the deformation the rotation of the microdomain relative to macrodomain is ignored.…”
Section: The Mrct Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seepersad et al [88] presented a robust topology design method for designing materials on mesoscopic scales by topologically and parametrically tailoring them to achieve elastic properties that are superior to those of standard or heuristic designs, customized for large-scale applications, and less sensitive to imperfections in the material. McVeigh et al [89] proposed a multi-resolution analysis framework for material design, in which a material is physically decomposed to each individual scale of interest, and the deformation and constitutive behavior of each scale can then be examined separately while determining the overall material properties. Pelegri and Tekkam [90] proposed a novel methodology for the maximization of mode I critical delamination fracture toughness using design of experiments and response surface, that allows continuous and discrete factors to be considered simultaneously like the width, length, thickness, stacking angle, and stacking sequence of the laminate.…”
Section: §4 Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%