2014
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2013.0611
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stiffest elastic networks

Abstract: The rigidity of a network of elastic beams is closely related to its microstructure. We show both numerically and theoretically that there is a class of isotropic networks, which are stiffer than any other isotropic network of same density. The elastic moduli of these stiffest elastic networks are explicitly given. They constitute upper-bounds, which compete or improve the well-known Hashin-Shtrikman bounds. We provide a convenient set of criteria (necessary and sufficient conditions) to identify these network… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
80
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[27]. For isotropic solids, the Young's modulus limit is defined by the HashinShtrikman bound [28], and for isotropic beam-based lattices the modulus limit is defined by the tighter Gurtner-Durand bound [29]. This scaling of stiffness and strength with relative density becomes particularly conspicuous for light and ultralight materials, where poor scaling relations can have ordersof-magnitude effects on the overall mechanical properties.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27]. For isotropic solids, the Young's modulus limit is defined by the HashinShtrikman bound [28], and for isotropic beam-based lattices the modulus limit is defined by the tighter Gurtner-Durand bound [29]. This scaling of stiffness and strength with relative density becomes particularly conspicuous for light and ultralight materials, where poor scaling relations can have ordersof-magnitude effects on the overall mechanical properties.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, physical models of pentamode isolators need to be constructed, employing, e.g., additive manufacturing techniques [8,9], and laboratory tested as seismic base-isolation devices [19], in order to experimentally asses their isolation and dissipation capabilities arising, e.g., from inelastic response and/or material fracture [20]. Another relevant generalization of the present research regards the design of dynamically tunable systems based on the insertion of prestressed cables and/or curved rods within pentamode lattices, with the aim of designing novel metamaterials and bio-inspired lattices tunable by local and global prestress [12][13][14][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Future studies will also address the experimentation of pentamode materials as components of new-generation seismic dampers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting, in particular, that in the linear elastic regime, perfectly hinged sfcc lattices exhibit an effective compression modulus equal to 2 3 ⁄ of the Young modulus of the stiffest elastic networks analyzed in Ref. [14]. We make some comparisons between the mechanical response of the pentamode materials analyzed in the present work and that of rubber bearings formed by elastomeric layers confined between stiffening plates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…When a relative rigid motion of the terminal bases is such that Eqns. (13)- (14) return ̇= 0 in each rod, i.e., ̇2 = 0 and ̇1 = , we say that such a motion represents an infinitesimal mechanism of the elementary module from the reference placement B.…”
Section: Incremental Kinematic Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%