2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale adaptive inference on conditional moment inequalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…78 I refer to Andrews and Shi (2013), Chernozhukov, Lee, and Rosen (2013), Lee, Song, and Whang (2013), Armstrong (2014Armstrong ( , 2015, Armstrong and Chan (2016), Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, and Kato (2018), and Chetverikov (2018), for inference methods in the case that the conditioning variables have a continuous distribution.…”
Section: Framework and Scope Of The Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…78 I refer to Andrews and Shi (2013), Chernozhukov, Lee, and Rosen (2013), Lee, Song, and Whang (2013), Armstrong (2014Armstrong ( , 2015, Armstrong and Chan (2016), Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, and Kato (2018), and Chetverikov (2018), for inference methods in the case that the conditioning variables have a continuous distribution.…”
Section: Framework and Scope Of The Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…;Andrews and Soares (2010);Canay (2010);Andrews and Barwick (2012);Romano, Shaikh, and Wolf (2014), among others, make significant contributions to circumvent these difficulties in the context of a finite number of unconditional moment (in)equalities Andrews and Shi (2013)Chernozhukov, Lee, and Rosen (2013);Lee, Song, and Whang (2013);Armstrong (2014Armstrong ( , 2015;Armstrong and Chan (2016);Chetverikov (2018), among others, make significant contributions to circumvent these difficulties in the context of a finite number of conditional moment (in)equalities (with continuously distributed conditioning variables) Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, and Kato (2018). and study, respectively, the challenging frameworks where the number of moment inequalities grows with sample size and where there is a continuum of conditional moment inequalities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, the variance of m(Y, Z)w z,h (Z). This is the test statistic used in Armstrong and Chan (2016), up to a minor modification that they use infinite sets Z n and H n . Since they couple the test statistic T with the (1 − α) quantile of the asymptotic distribution of T when E[m(Y, Z)|Z] = 0 almost surely, it follows that the power of their test essentially coincides with that of our one-step bootstrap tests, which can be improved by using our two-step and three-step bootstrap tests.…”
Section: Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moment inequality selection methods and corresponding methods of inference based on GMM-type estimators are developed in Andrews and Guggenberger (2009), Andrews and Soares (2010) and Andrews and Barwick (2012). Extensions of GMM to conditional moment inequality models have also been considered; see, e.g., Shi (2013, 2014), Armstrong (2014Armstrong ( , 2015, Armstrong and Chan (2016) and Khan and Tamer (2009). Misspeci ed moment inequalities are studied in Ponomareva and Tamer (2011) and Bugni et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%