2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016wr018719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale pore‐network representation of heterogeneous carbonate rocks

Abstract: A multiscale network integration approach introduced by Jiang et al. (2013) is used to generate a representative pore‐network for a carbonate rock with a pore size distribution across several orders of magnitude. We predict the macroscopic flow parameters of the rock utilising (i) 3‐D images captured by X‐ray computed microtomography and (ii) pore‐network flow simulations. To capture the multiscale pore size distribution of the rock, we imaged four different rock samples at different resolutions and integrated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific challenges in image processing include the potentially large errors that are the result of performing the analysis on individual cross-sectional slices in 2D rather than 3D analysis, which creates directional bias and ignores geometrical information from planes directly above or below each 2D slice (Iassonov et al, 2009;Kaestner et al, 2008). Another image processing artefact is the partial volume effect, where features smaller than one voxel become upscaled to one voxel (Pak et al, 2016). An XµCTspecific image processing problem are real ring artefacts, due to detector drift, and quasi-ring artefacts, due to inconsistent X-ray beam intensity (Antoine et al, 2002).…”
Section: X-ray Computed Microtomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specific challenges in image processing include the potentially large errors that are the result of performing the analysis on individual cross-sectional slices in 2D rather than 3D analysis, which creates directional bias and ignores geometrical information from planes directly above or below each 2D slice (Iassonov et al, 2009;Kaestner et al, 2008). Another image processing artefact is the partial volume effect, where features smaller than one voxel become upscaled to one voxel (Pak et al, 2016). An XµCTspecific image processing problem are real ring artefacts, due to detector drift, and quasi-ring artefacts, due to inconsistent X-ray beam intensity (Antoine et al, 2002).…”
Section: X-ray Computed Microtomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaestner et al, 2008, note the importance of removing these before further processing. Additionally, if pore sizes span several orders of magnitude, images at different XµCT resolutions need to be combined to create accurate, multi-scale pore network models (Pak et al, 2016). The final stage is quantifying the image processing error -which is infrequently done in the literature.…”
Section: X-ray Computed Microtomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knackstedt et al, 2012;Bin et al, 2013;Bultreys et al, 2015) and carbonates (e.g. Lopez et al, 2012;Prodanovic et al, 2015;Pak et al, 2016;Fheed et al, 2018). Authigenic clays and carbonate cements have a strong influence on porosities and pore-throat geometries and hence reservoir quality by profoundly modifying the nano-to macroscale porosity and permeability characteristics .…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulation (e.g., Blunt ; Pak et al ) offers a faster and nondestructive way to build pore network models and to calculate transport properties. These computational methods are typically based on analog (e.g., CAD) or image‐derived (e.g., computed tomography, CT) pore‐network topologies that allow us to simulate coupling between physical and chemical processes to predict transport properties (Ryazanov et al ; Van der Land et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%