2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.112960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale-Spectral GFEM and optimal oversampling

Abstract: In this work we address the Multiscale Spectral Generalized Finite Element Method (MS-GFEM) developed in [I. Babuška and R. Lipton, Multiscale Modeling and Simulation 9 (2011), pp. 373-406]. We outline the numerical implementation of this method and present simulations that demonstrate contrast independent exponential convergence of MS-GFEM solutions. We introduce strategies to reduce the computational cost of generating the optimal oversampled local approximating spaces used here. These strategies retain accu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors proved quasi-optimality of the final multiscale space in the sense that Galerkin approximations to symmetric elliptic problems converge exponentially fast depending on the dimension of the space. The approach was later generalized to other applications, for which we refer to Smetana and Patera (2016), Babuška, Lipton, Sinz and Stuebner (2020) and the references therein. As an alternative to the spectral construction of basis functions, it is also possible to use randomized sampling algorithms to approximate the optimal subspaces with provable nearly optimal convergence rate; see Buhr and Smetana (2018).…”
Section: History Of Spectral Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors proved quasi-optimality of the final multiscale space in the sense that Galerkin approximations to symmetric elliptic problems converge exponentially fast depending on the dimension of the space. The approach was later generalized to other applications, for which we refer to Smetana and Patera (2016), Babuška, Lipton, Sinz and Stuebner (2020) and the references therein. As an alternative to the spectral construction of basis functions, it is also possible to use randomized sampling algorithms to approximate the optimal subspaces with provable nearly optimal convergence rate; see Buhr and Smetana (2018).…”
Section: History Of Spectral Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we employ an adaptive algorithm that is driven by a probabilistic a posteriori error estimator. The output of the algorithm is an approximation space Λ n rand that satisfies the property 7 where the accuracy tol and the failure probability ε algofail are prescribed by the user. For further details we refer to section SM2 and to [12] where methods from randomized linear algebra [27] have been used to approximate the optimal local approximation spaces in the elliptic setting.…”
Section: Approximation Of the Optimal Local Approximation Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning (real-world) applications the optimal local approximation spaces are employed, for instance, for the construction of digital twins [34,38] and in the context of data assimilation [59]. Other options for approximating the optimal local reduced spaces besides the random sampling technique [12] employed here are proposed in [7,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2], based on PUM, an optimal local basis is constructed for elliptic equations with rough coefficients, which achieves O(H) accuracy in the energy norm using only O(log d+1 (1/H)) number of basis functions in each local domain. Moreover, by using the right-hand side information, a nearly exponentially decaying error with respect to the number of basis functions can be achieved; see also [1,3]. We will borrow some techniques in [2] to prove the nearly exponential convergence of our method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%