2023
DOI: 10.15252/msb.202211490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multisite assessment of reproducibility in high‐content cell migration imaging data

Abstract: High‐content image‐based cell phenotyping provides fundamental insights into a broad variety of life science disciplines. Striving for accurate conclusions and meaningful impact demands high reproducibility standards, with particular relevance for high‐quality open‐access data sharing and meta‐analysis. However, the sources and degree of biological and technical variability, and thus the reproducibility and usefulness of meta‐analysis of results from live‐cell microscopy, have not been systematically investiga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, CellTracksColab is not currently adapted for lineage tracing studies. Researchers focusing on lineage tracing must explore alternative tools specifically developed for such analyses 1,3,22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, CellTracksColab is not currently adapted for lineage tracing studies. Researchers focusing on lineage tracing must explore alternative tools specifically developed for such analyses 1,3,22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing image repositories, such as the BioImage Archive 23 and the Image Data Resource 24 , demonstrate the feasibility and value of sharing microscopy data. Analyzed tracking datasets are also very valuable; they hold significant potential for reanalysis and meta-analysis and offer a more manageable alternative to storing raw video footage 25 . Moreover, they can serve the purpose of new machine-learning tracking algorithm development and benchmarking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%