Multivalent Binding of a Ligand-Coated Particle: Role of Shape, Size, and Ligand Heterogeneity

Abstract

We utilize a multiscale modeling framework to study the effect of shape, size, and ligand composition on the efficacy of binding of a ligand-coated particle to a substrate functionalized with the target receptors. First, we show how molecular dynamics along with steered molecular dynamics calculations can be used to accurately parameterize the molecular-binding free energy and the effective spring constant for a receptor-ligand pair. We demonstrate this for two ligands that bind to the αβ-domain of integrin. Next, we show how these effective potentials can be used to build computational models at the meso- and continuum-scales. These models incorporate the molecular nature of the receptor-ligand interactions and yet provide an inexpensive route to study the multivalent interaction of receptors and ligands through the construction of Bell potentials customized to the molecular identities. We quantify the binding efficacy of the ligand-coated-particle in terms of its multivalency, binding free-energy landscape, and the losses in the configurational entropies. We show that 1) the binding avidity for particle sizes less than 350 nm is set by the competition between the enthalpic and entropic contributions, whereas that for sizes above 350 nm is dominated by the enthalpy of binding; 2) anisotropic particles display higher levels of multivalent binding compared to those of spherical particles; and 3) variations in ligand composition can alter binding avidity without altering the average multivalency. The methods and results presented here have wide applications in the rational design of functionalized carriers and also in understanding cell adhesion.

The membrane microenvironment regulates the sequential attachment of bacteria to host cells

“…While VHH density promoted specific attachment, the adhesin affinity and reaction rates ended up being a surprisingly weak regulator of attachment and detachment. This could be explained by the fact after engaging several adhesins of relatively high affinity, bacterial overall avidity rapidly predominates over the affinity of individual adhesins 35 . In contrast, we found that mechanical factors of the host environment strongly regulate each of the stages of adhesion.…”

Emergent membrane morphologies in relaxed and tense membranes in presence of reversible adhesive pinning interactions

“…∆ G is the free energy of pinning and k bell the stiffness of the pinning interaction. For the results presented here we take the interaction energy parameters that are comparable to intercellular adhesion molecule ICAM [44], given as ∆ G = 19 k B T and k bell = 60 k B T/a 0 , unless otherwise stated. To extend our model to include other adhesion molecules, we also study the effect of a range of pinning energy parameters.…”

Advances in Lipid and Metal Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Peptide Delivery

“…An important aspect of MNPs is their bioconjugation by using a variety of surface functionalization molecules, which may help the peptide-NP conjugate to cross the multiple biological barriers they face and protect them from mechanisms of immune recognition and cellular clearance [135]. Based in the principle of multivalence, the unique interactions between peptide and NP surface provide an improved selectivity [147]. Depending on the NP shape, size and surface chemistry, the binding of a functionalized nanoparticle can promote or enhance specificity to target cells or cell surface molecules [37].…”