2012
DOI: 10.2514/1.55185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariable Adaptive Piecewise Linear Control Design for NASA Generic Transport Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48 The nonlinear system is linearized at steady-state, straight, wings-level flight condition at 75 and 85 kt, both at 800 ft, and the resulting dynamics at each operating point are given, respectively, as follows: x ∈ [−1, 1], i ∈ [1,4], j ∈ [1, 2], p = 1, 2 (the notation K (i, j) represents the (i, j)th entry of matrix K). 48 The nonlinear system is linearized at steady-state, straight, wings-level flight condition at 75 and 85 kt, both at 800 ft, and the resulting dynamics at each operating point are given, respectively, as follows: x ∈ [−1, 1], i ∈ [1,4], j ∈ [1, 2], p = 1, 2 (the notation K (i, j) represents the (i, j)th entry of matrix K).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…48 The nonlinear system is linearized at steady-state, straight, wings-level flight condition at 75 and 85 kt, both at 800 ft, and the resulting dynamics at each operating point are given, respectively, as follows: x ∈ [−1, 1], i ∈ [1,4], j ∈ [1, 2], p = 1, 2 (the notation K (i, j) represents the (i, j)th entry of matrix K). 48 The nonlinear system is linearized at steady-state, straight, wings-level flight condition at 75 and 85 kt, both at 800 ft, and the resulting dynamics at each operating point are given, respectively, as follows: x ∈ [−1, 1], i ∈ [1,4], j ∈ [1, 2], p = 1, 2 (the notation K (i, j) represents the (i, j)th entry of matrix K).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we study the effectiveness of the proposed adaptive hybrid control policy using the NASA GTM. 48 The nonlinear system is linearized at steady-state, straight, wings-level flight condition at 75 and 85 kt, both at 800 ft, and the resulting dynamics at each operating point are given, respectively, as follows: [1,2], p = 1, 2 (the notation K (i, j) represents the (i, j)th entry of matrix K). This leads to have R = 26.71.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the flight dynamics have nonlinear nature, the linear approximation of the system leads to controllers with stability and performance limitations. To overcome such limitations there exist in the literature a variety of control methodologies which provide important advances in GSC and hybrid and nonlinear approaches [5][6][7][8]; see also GSC surveys [1,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scheduling variable in our reference model design process is an endogenous parameter, which in the gas turbine engine case is a function of the gas turbine engine spool speeds. Some of the works dedicated to the adaptive control of systems with multiple equilibrium points and with time varying reference systems are [7,8,9,10]. Adaptive control of piecewise linear systems has been developed in [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%