2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.07.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariable assessment of the right ventricle by echocardiography in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot undergoing pulmonary valve replacement: A comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: Commonly used echocardiography variables, such as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and tricuspid annular peak systolic velocity, did not sensitively evaluate global RVEF. A global approach, that includes the whole RV and integration of its different components, was more reliable in patients with rTOF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not observe a correlation between RV size by echocardiogram and CMRI‐derived RV volumes in the current study, and we speculate that the differences between our results and that of Selly et al may be due to the differences in imaging technique (3D‐echocardiogram‐derived RV volume vs 2D‐echocardiograph‐derived RV surface areas). Additionally, the Selly et al study did not identify a correlation between TAPSE and RV s', and CMRI‐derived RVEF, but we suspect that this may be related to a small sample size because that study was based on a cohort 26 patients. Since 3D‐echocardiogram is still not routinely used for the assessment of RV function in clinical practice in this population, the 2D‐echocardiographic indices reported in our study may have a wider application in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did not observe a correlation between RV size by echocardiogram and CMRI‐derived RV volumes in the current study, and we speculate that the differences between our results and that of Selly et al may be due to the differences in imaging technique (3D‐echocardiogram‐derived RV volume vs 2D‐echocardiograph‐derived RV surface areas). Additionally, the Selly et al study did not identify a correlation between TAPSE and RV s', and CMRI‐derived RVEF, but we suspect that this may be related to a small sample size because that study was based on a cohort 26 patients. Since 3D‐echocardiogram is still not routinely used for the assessment of RV function in clinical practice in this population, the 2D‐echocardiographic indices reported in our study may have a wider application in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Among the 2D‐echocardiographic indices assessed in that study, only FAC correlated with RVEF . We did not observe a correlation between RV size by echocardiogram and CMRI‐derived RV volumes in the current study, and we speculate that the differences between our results and that of Selly et al may be due to the differences in imaging technique (3D‐echocardiogram‐derived RV volume vs 2D‐echocardiograph‐derived RV surface areas). Additionally, the Selly et al study did not identify a correlation between TAPSE and RV s', and CMRI‐derived RVEF, but we suspect that this may be related to a small sample size because that study was based on a cohort 26 patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…This might lead to the RV function being overestimated as the four‐chamber focused RV view entirely excludes the RV outflow tract. The FAC has, however, demonstrated utility in showing appreciable concordance with RVEF on CMR both postsurgical and presurgical intervention in this population . In replication, our limited clinical model of predicting early or late recovery in surgical ICU was also best predicted by a model based on the FAC (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 However, as RVEDA and RVFAC measured by 2D echocardiography show linear correlation with RV volume and EF measured by CMR, 40 RVEDA and RVFAC are considered useful tools for assessing RV function in the clinical setting. 41 Third, this was a cross-sectional study, so to analyze the true effect of aging on LV deformation, a longitudinal follow-up study is needed. Another important factor to consider is that the age of surgery for TOF in our T3 group was older than that in the T1 and T2 groups; this difference may affect LV function.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%