2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf03543247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate analysis of drought tolerance in wheat substitution lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean tuber yields (kg ha -1 ) under both conditions were used to determine the drought tolerance level of tested sweet potato genotypes based on the calculated drought tolerance indices previously employed by various studies. The indices included MP (mean performance), STI (stress tolerance index), and SSI (stress susceptibility index) (Bidinger et al 1978;Fischer and Maurer 1978;Mau et al , 2014, GMP (geometric mean performance), MRP (mean relative performance), HARM (harmonic yield), YSI (yield stress index), REI (relative expression index), and SNPI= Stress non-stress production index (Farshadfar and Sutka 2002;Moosavi et al 2008;Farshadfar and Elyasi 2012;Ali et al 2013;Mau et al 2019).…”
Section: Observation and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mean tuber yields (kg ha -1 ) under both conditions were used to determine the drought tolerance level of tested sweet potato genotypes based on the calculated drought tolerance indices previously employed by various studies. The indices included MP (mean performance), STI (stress tolerance index), and SSI (stress susceptibility index) (Bidinger et al 1978;Fischer and Maurer 1978;Mau et al , 2014, GMP (geometric mean performance), MRP (mean relative performance), HARM (harmonic yield), YSI (yield stress index), REI (relative expression index), and SNPI= Stress non-stress production index (Farshadfar and Sutka 2002;Moosavi et al 2008;Farshadfar and Elyasi 2012;Ali et al 2013;Mau et al 2019).…”
Section: Observation and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to STI, SSI, and YSI, which have a specific standard range of index value to select for drought-tolerant genotypes, the drought indices MRP, HARM, REI dan SNPI (Farshadfar and Sutka 2002;Moosavi et al 2008;Ali et al 2013) provide no such range of index value for the preferred genotypes selection. The higher the values of these indices, the better; thus, certain selection intensity needs to be set up to select the most desirable/drought tolerant genotypes based on these indices.…”
Section: Drought Tolerance Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sixteen drought tolerance indices were calculated using the following relationships (Fischer and Maurer, 1978;Fischer et al, 1998;Fernandez, 1992;Rosielle & Hamblin, 1981;Bouslama & Schapaugh, 1984;Lan, 1998;Moosavi et al, 2008;Farshadfar & Sutka, 2002):…”
Section: Calculation Of Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress tolerance index (STI) was defined as a useful tool for determining high yield and stress tolerance potential of genotypes (Fernandez, 1992). To improve the efficiency of STI a modified stress tolerance index (MSTI) was suggested by Farshadfar and Sutka (2002) which corrects the STI as a weight. Moosavi et al, (2008) introduced stress susceptibility percentage index (SSPI), stress non-stress production index (SNPI) and abiotic tolerance index (ATI) for screening drought tolerant genotypes in stress and non-stress conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%