2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate analysis of grain amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) accessions to quantify phenotypic diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
0
4

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of leaves (36.33-199.66) corresponding to results reported by Bashyal et al ( 2018) is much higher [38] compared to values presented in our study. Interesting is that even though the above-mentioned studies present superior values of plant heights, and number of leaves, the reported dry grain yields ranging between 724.96-1183.58 kg grains/ha [37], and 432-979 kg grains/ha [38], are inferior to those obtained in our study. This finding suggests that A. cruentus and A. hypochondriacus have a high productive potential in cultivation conditions of our trial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The number of leaves (36.33-199.66) corresponding to results reported by Bashyal et al ( 2018) is much higher [38] compared to values presented in our study. Interesting is that even though the above-mentioned studies present superior values of plant heights, and number of leaves, the reported dry grain yields ranging between 724.96-1183.58 kg grains/ha [37], and 432-979 kg grains/ha [38], are inferior to those obtained in our study. This finding suggests that A. cruentus and A. hypochondriacus have a high productive potential in cultivation conditions of our trial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The reason may be the different varieties used in our trial, meaning A. cruentus and A. hypochondriacus versus A. triclor. Our results concerning plant height frame within a narrower range, and mean plant heigths have lower values, compared to those reported by Baturaygil et al (2021) in amaranth hybrids, between 109-253 cm [37], Bashyal et al (2018) between 75.98-167.14 cm [38], and Génalis and Seguin (2008) in eight amaranth genotypes, between 143-168 cm [39]. The number of leaves (36.33-199.66) corresponding to results reported by Bashyal et al ( 2018) is much higher [38] compared to values presented in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason may be the different varieties used in our trial, meaning A. cruentus and A. hypochondriacus versus A. triclor. Our results concerning plant height frame within a narrower range, and mean plant heights have lower values, compared to those reported by Baturaygil et al (2021) in amaranth hybrids, which were between 109 and 253 cm [36], those by Bashyal et al (2018) between 75.98 and 167.14 cm [37], and those by Génalis and Seguin (2008) in eight amaranth genotypes, between 143 and 168 cm [38]. The number of leaves (36.33-199.66) corresponding to results reported by Bashyal et al ( 2018) is much higher [37] compared to values presented in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Our results concerning plant height frame within a narrower range, and mean plant heights have lower values, compared to those reported by Baturaygil et al (2021) in amaranth hybrids, which were between 109 and 253 cm [36], those by Bashyal et al (2018) between 75.98 and 167.14 cm [37], and those by Génalis and Seguin (2008) in eight amaranth genotypes, between 143 and 168 cm [38]. The number of leaves (36.33-199.66) corresponding to results reported by Bashyal et al ( 2018) is much higher [37] compared to values presented in our study. It is interesting to note that even though the above-mentioned studies present superior values of plant heights and number of leaves, the reported dry grain yields ranging between 724.96 and 1183.58 kg grains/ha [36], and 432 and 979 kg grains/ha [37], are inferior to those obtained in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%