2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate chemometrics for the forensic discrimination of blue ball-point pen inks based on their Vis spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Number of pairs ¼ nðn À 1Þ 2 (4) In this method, the DP was achieved 92.8%, which confirm that the proposed method is able to differentiate a significant number of pen-pair samples.…”
Section: Differentiated Analysissupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Number of pairs ¼ nðn À 1Þ 2 (4) In this method, the DP was achieved 92.8%, which confirm that the proposed method is able to differentiate a significant number of pen-pair samples.…”
Section: Differentiated Analysissupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The vehicle, whose composition affects the flowing and drying characteristics of the ink, can consist of oils, solvents and resins. Other substances used for finely tuning the characteristics including driers, plasticizers, waxes, greases, soaps and detergents [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principal component analysis (PCA) was one of the methods implemented by Thanasoulias et al [8] in their interpretation of visible spectrophotometry data from a range of blue ballpoint pen inks. This method was found to discriminate successfully between the five different brands of pen examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally for the crossing line forgery (type c)), the presence of a gap at the toner distribution map was used as a criterion to know if the ink line was 8 | J. Name., 2012, 00, [1][2][3] This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 made before printing toner. This was successfully identified in 85% of the samples (17 out of 20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, frauds occur by misuse of blank documents by persons who are trusted by the signer or by adulteration of an official document. Most of the reports involving document analysis to detect frauds employ destructive methodologies [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The use of non-destructive analytical methods in cases where the authenticity of documents is questioned is essential in litigation processes where the evidence must be preserved [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%