2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate distribution model for stress variability characterisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data on triaxially deformed gypsum are scarce and it was therefore interesting to compare our new results with existing data on Volterra gypsum. However, due to the strong impact of sample size on strength (Paterson and Wong, 2005, Bozorgzadeh et al, 2017, Gao et al, 2018, we were unable to perform this comparison using the results of Brantut et al (2011), despite the similarities with our data. We instead present in Figure 23 a comparison of the dry failure envelopes of branching selenite gypsum (from this study) and of Volterra gypsum based on the study of Olgaard et al (1995), who used a comparable sample size.…”
Section: Impact Of Effective Pressurementioning
confidence: 75%
“…Data on triaxially deformed gypsum are scarce and it was therefore interesting to compare our new results with existing data on Volterra gypsum. However, due to the strong impact of sample size on strength (Paterson and Wong, 2005, Bozorgzadeh et al, 2017, Gao et al, 2018, we were unable to perform this comparison using the results of Brantut et al (2011), despite the similarities with our data. We instead present in Figure 23 a comparison of the dry failure envelopes of branching selenite gypsum (from this study) and of Volterra gypsum based on the study of Olgaard et al (1995), who used a comparable sample size.…”
Section: Impact Of Effective Pressurementioning
confidence: 75%
“…It is worth emphasizing that we propose a novel tensor‐based framework, which processes stress data in an integrated form and does not violates their inherent tensorial nature (Gao & Harrison, , ), for characterizing stress variability in fractured rocks. This formalism aims to improve the conventional decoupled analysis, which customarily separates the information of stress magnitude/orientation and may lead to biased interpretations as also has been recognized by Hudson and Cooling ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtain the stress field from the FEMDEM simulation in which all components of the second‐rank Cauchy stress tensor at each element node are determined. We analyze the stress data using the recently developed tensor‐based mathematical formulations (Gao, ; Gao & Harrison, , ), which overcome the drawbacks of conventional decoupled analysis of stress magnitude and orientation information (further discussions are in Text S2 and Figure S5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, stress is tensor in nature formed by six distinct components. The conventional decoupled analysis of principal stress magnitude and orientation, which was usually adopted in the literature [38][39][40][41], may lead to biased assessment results [29,31,34,36,42,43].…”
Section: Effective Variancescalar-valued Stress Dispersion Quantificamentioning
confidence: 99%