2010
DOI: 10.1080/02331880903236926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate measurement error models based on scale mixtures of the skew–normal distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They proposed a simple method for obtaining consistent estimators, based on the corrected score approach. More recently, Lachos et al (2010c) have introduced MEM with scale mixtures of skew-normal distributions (SMSN-MEM) and presented a complete likelihood based analysis, including an efficient EM algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They proposed a simple method for obtaining consistent estimators, based on the corrected score approach. More recently, Lachos et al (2010c) have introduced MEM with scale mixtures of skew-normal distributions (SMSN-MEM) and presented a complete likelihood based analysis, including an efficient EM algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The violation of this assumption can have adverse consequences for the efficiency of estimators (Cook and Weisberg 1982), so it is important to detect the variance heterogeneity in MEM. Motived by the work of Lachos et al (2010c), in this paper we discuss the local influence analysis and a score test statistic for assessing homogeneity of the skewness parameter, which is a parameter included in the variance, in SMSN-MEM. Since the observed log-likelihood function of SMSN models involves some integrals, a direct application of Cook's (1986) local influence approach can be very difficult to apply, because these measures involve the first and second partial derivatives of the log-likelihood function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LLFT model has been used in survival analysis as a parametric model for mortality rate, hydrology, and networked telerobots (see, e.g., [20]). Following the same procedure as in [17], we can construct new robust FT models through differing designations of κ(η) and the distribution of η. Particularly, in the regulation of tail distribution in the FT model, a log-slash failure time (LSFT) model can be obtained by taking κ(η) = η −1 and η ∼ Beta(1/2, 1)-that is Beta distribution.…”
Section: The Class Of Smlnft Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LLFT model has been used in survival analysis as a parametric model for mortality rate, hydrology, and networked telerobots (see, e.g., [19]). Following the same procedure as in [20,21], we can construct new robust FT models through differing designations of κ(η) and the distribution of η. Particularly, in the regulation of tail distribution in the FT model, a log-slash failure time (LSFT) model can be obtained by taking κ(η) = η −1 and η ∼ Beta(1/2, 1); that is Beta distribution.…”
Section: Of 15mentioning
confidence: 99%