2013
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle function and hydrodynamics limit power and speed in swimming frogs

Abstract: Studies of the muscle force-velocity relationship and its derived n-shaped power-velocity curve offer important insights into muscular limits of performance. Given the power is maximal at 1/3 V max , geometric scaling of muscle force coupled with fluid drag force implies that this optimal muscle-shortening velocity for power cannot be maintained across the natural body-size range. Instead, muscle velocity may decrease with increasing body size, conferring a similar n-shaped power curve with body size. Here we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis Daudin, 1802, is one of the most widely used organisms in biological research, including applications in cell and molecular biology, genetics, physiology, embryology, development and morphogenesis, neuroscience, biomechanics, toxicology and medicine (Gurdon et al. ; Gurdon & Hopwood, ; Burggren & Warburton, ; Wheeler & Brändli, ; Harland & Grainger, ; Cline & Kelly, ; Clemente & Richards, ; Richards & Clemente, ; Robovská‐Havelková et al. ; Burgess, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis Daudin, 1802, is one of the most widely used organisms in biological research, including applications in cell and molecular biology, genetics, physiology, embryology, development and morphogenesis, neuroscience, biomechanics, toxicology and medicine (Gurdon et al. ; Gurdon & Hopwood, ; Burggren & Warburton, ; Wheeler & Brändli, ; Harland & Grainger, ; Cline & Kelly, ; Clemente & Richards, ; Richards & Clemente, ; Robovská‐Havelková et al. ; Burgess, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we address time-varying gearing. Although inlever (r) does not vary over the in vivo range of frog ankle joint motion [27,30,31], the outlever (R) may vary due to (i) the angle of the fluid reaction force vector changing with respect to the foot orientation [8] or (ii) as the foot's position relative to the ankle changes throughout a stroke. To address this, R can be estimated at various points in the foot stroke (see §2).…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…body mass; N ¼ 5). The PL inlever, r, value of 0.14 cm was obtained from the tendon travel technique [27]. To calculate R, the foot centroid was located from digital tracings of photographs of the feet (ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).…”
Section: Estimating In Vivo Gear Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These questions require modelling the physical forces resisting muscle contraction (Marsh, 1999). In some cases, simple modelling can demonstrate how 'environmental feedback' (Aerts and Nauwelaerts, 2009) can reduce the 'volume' of muscle performance space (Richards, 2011;Richards and Clemente, 2013;Clemente and Richards, 2013). In other cases, for example in swimming fish, sophisticated modelling is required to reveal how optimal muscle function is dependent upon the mechanical properties of the body, which governs fluid-structure interactions (Tytell et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%