The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Indigenous Australia and New Guinea 2021
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190095611.013.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Museum Collections and Their Legacies

Abstract: Museums continue to be cast as anachronistic—‘weary’, ‘tired’, and ‘out of touch’—trophy houses embedded in the colonial past, with object collections considered hollow remnants of that past. This article contests this notion and reveals how museums have emerged over the past fifty years as active field sites where Indigenous communities, scholars, artists, and artisans in the Pacific have been and are engaging with their cultural patrimony. This approach has seen new meanings and readings of, and new life bre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limitations on in-person visits also reduce opportunities for communities to examine or photograph unprovenanced (or under-provenanced) objects with the aim of determining whether or not they rightfully belong to their Country. While this state of affairs will no doubt resolve itself when access protocols are revised, the current risk-averse policies means that progress towards a deeper understanding of the materials is stalled [48]. Moreover, Traditional Owners have an additional administrative burden when seeking access to their own cultural property and-in the case of the Australian Message Stick Project-have relied on non-Indigenous intermediaries to navigate the bureaucracy on their behalf.…”
Section: Access Issues and Indigenous Cultural And Intellectual Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations on in-person visits also reduce opportunities for communities to examine or photograph unprovenanced (or under-provenanced) objects with the aim of determining whether or not they rightfully belong to their Country. While this state of affairs will no doubt resolve itself when access protocols are revised, the current risk-averse policies means that progress towards a deeper understanding of the materials is stalled [48]. Moreover, Traditional Owners have an additional administrative burden when seeking access to their own cultural property and-in the case of the Australian Message Stick Project-have relied on non-Indigenous intermediaries to navigate the bureaucracy on their behalf.…”
Section: Access Issues and Indigenous Cultural And Intellectual Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%