2017
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2017.185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutant p53 partners in crime

Abstract: Mutant p53 proteins impart changes in cellular behavior and function through interactions with proteins that alter gene expression. The milieu of intracellular proteins available to interact with mutant p53 is context specific and changes with disease, cell type, and environmental conditions. Varying conformations of mutant p53 largely dictate protein–protein interactions as different point mutations within protein-coding regions greatly alter the extent and array of gain-of-function (GOF) activities. Given su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
233
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(61 reference statements)
5
233
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of this, mutant frequency was found to directly correlate with loss of transactivation function (Kato et al, 2003). The preferential selection of missense mutants together with their excessive stabilization therefore points at additional mechanisms that promote tumor development beyond a mere loss of DNA binding activity: Missense mutants exhibit dominant-negative effects on remaining wild-type p53 and display neomorphic properties thatlike an oncogene-actively drive tumor development to a metastatic and drug-resistant state (Freed-Pastor & Prives, 2012;Muller & Vousden, 2014;Kim & Lozano, 2018;Stiewe & Haran, 2018). Furthermore, missense mutants are unstable in normal unstressed cells, but become constitutively stabilized in tumors by Hsp90 which protects mutant p53 from degradation by Mdm2 and CHIP (Terzian et al, 2008;Alexandrova et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In support of this, mutant frequency was found to directly correlate with loss of transactivation function (Kato et al, 2003). The preferential selection of missense mutants together with their excessive stabilization therefore points at additional mechanisms that promote tumor development beyond a mere loss of DNA binding activity: Missense mutants exhibit dominant-negative effects on remaining wild-type p53 and display neomorphic properties thatlike an oncogene-actively drive tumor development to a metastatic and drug-resistant state (Freed-Pastor & Prives, 2012;Muller & Vousden, 2014;Kim & Lozano, 2018;Stiewe & Haran, 2018). Furthermore, missense mutants are unstable in normal unstressed cells, but become constitutively stabilized in tumors by Hsp90 which protects mutant p53 from degradation by Mdm2 and CHIP (Terzian et al, 2008;Alexandrova et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The addiction of tumors to mutant p53 was demonstrated in the mutant TP53 knock-in mice, as the tamoxifen-induced mutant p53 ablation resulted in reduction of tumor growth, induction of apoptosis, and tumor regression, leading to 37% increase in animal survival (Alexandrova et al, 2015). It is believed that “gain of function” characteristics of the mutant p53 could be achieved via one of the two major mechanisms: a mutation conferring ability to transactivate the completely new set of genes (possibly via interaction with other transcription factors and chromatin remodeling proteins) and/or the interaction with other cellular proteins/signaling pathways (Freed-Pastor & Prives, 2012; Kim & Lozano, 2018). Precise details of both of these mechanisms will be dictated by the cell type and context and may be rather dynamic.…”
Section: Mutant P53 Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mouse modeling of such mutants places them in two classes based upon the tumorigenesis phenotype (Kim & Lozano, 2018;Sabapathy & Lane, 2018). The majority of such genetic alterations block the sequencespecific binding of p53, rendering the protein transcriptionally dead.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%