1991
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.24.11378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutants of Escherichia coli initiator tRNA that suppress amber codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and are aminoacylated with tyrosine by yeast extracts.

Abstract: We recently described mutants ofEschenchia coU initiator tRNA that suppress amber termination codons (UAG) in E. coUl. These mutants have changes in the anticodon sequence (CAU --CUA) that allow them to read the amber codon and changes in the acceptor stem that allow them to bind to the ribosomal aminoacyl (A) site. We show here that a subset of these mutants suppress amber codons in Saccharomyces cerevsiae and that they are aminoacylated with tyrosine by yeast extracts. Analysis of a number of mutants as subs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies confirm the results of in vitro analyses and show that all the mutants that have a 1:72 base pair are active in elongation in vivo in E. coli and in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (10,19,29,35).…”
Section: Downloaded Fromsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These studies confirm the results of in vitro analyses and show that all the mutants that have a 1:72 base pair are active in elongation in vivo in E. coli and in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (10,19,29,35).…”
Section: Downloaded Fromsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Two shifts involving tRNA-Lys and tRNA-Asn do not contradict any known identity determinants, since the posterior state tRNA-Lys identity is dependent mainly on the anticodon (Stello et al 1999;Francin and Mirande 2006). Out of the remaining six shifts, two have mutations that contradict the known identity determinants of one anticodon state: These are for tRNA-Tyr (G72) (Lee and RajBhandary 1991) and tRNA-Leu (A73 and A37) (Breitschopf and Gross 1994;Breitschopf et al 1995). For the remaining four, we found no relevant identity determinant data to support or contradict coevolution at these sites.…”
Section: Alloacceptor Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, once the aminoacylated suppressor tRNA has inserted the unnatural amino acid at the designated site in the target protein, it will be re-aminoacylated with a natural amino acid and insert the natural amino acid instead of the analogue, thus generating a heterogeneous pool of target protein molecules. Many such orthogonal suppressor tRNAs have been established over the past years, including suppressor tRNAs derived from the eubacterial tRNA Tyr [31][32][33][34][35][36], archaeal tRNA Tyr [37], yeast tRNA Phe [38], bacterial tRNA Trp [39], E. coli tRNA Gln [15,18], and even human and E. coli initiator tRNAs [40,16,13]. The next requirement is the use of an orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase that specifically recognizes the suppressor tRNA but no other tRNA in the cell ( Figure 3A) (reviewed in [41][42][43][44]).…”
Section: Orthogonal Suppressor Trnas For Site-specific Insertion Of Umentioning
confidence: 99%