2005
DOI: 10.1128/jb.187.19.6841-6844.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation at the “Exit Gate” of the Salmonella Gyrase A Subunit Suppresses a Defect in the Gyrase B Subunit

Abstract: In Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, an S431P substitution in the B subunit of gyrase (allele gyrB651) confers resistance to nalidixic acid and causes reduced DNA superhelicity and hypersensitivity to novobiocin. Selection for novobiocin resistance allowed isolation of a mutation in the gyrA gene (allele gyrA659), a T467S substitution, which partially suppresses the supercoiling defect of gyrB651. Modeling analysis suggests that this mutation acts by destabilizing the GyrA bottom dimer interface. This i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study investigating fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella enterica, Blanc-Potard et al characterised a pleiotropic mutation in gyrB causing ciprofloxacin resistance and concomitant novobiocin sensitivity. They subsequently identified an epistatic and compensatory mutation in gyrA that restored novobiocin sensitivity to wild-type levels while further augmenting fluoroquinolone resistance [14]. Notably, the epistatic mutation (Thr467Ser) was located at the dimer interface region, thus confirming the ability of mutation at this region in GyrA to influence both ciprofloxacin and novobiocin sensitivity, a finding consistent with the current observations in C. difficile.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a previous study investigating fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella enterica, Blanc-Potard et al characterised a pleiotropic mutation in gyrB causing ciprofloxacin resistance and concomitant novobiocin sensitivity. They subsequently identified an epistatic and compensatory mutation in gyrA that restored novobiocin sensitivity to wild-type levels while further augmenting fluoroquinolone resistance [14]. Notably, the epistatic mutation (Thr467Ser) was located at the dimer interface region, thus confirming the ability of mutation at this region in GyrA to influence both ciprofloxacin and novobiocin sensitivity, a finding consistent with the current observations in C. difficile.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Notably, the epistatic mutation (Thr467Ser) was located at the dimer interface region, thus confirming the ability of mutation at this region in GyrA to influence both ciprofloxacin and novobiocin sensitivity, a finding consistent with the current observations in C. difficile. We speculate that the Ala384Asp mutation in C. difficile may be functionally analogous to the Thr467Ser mutation in Salmonella GyrA that results in a predicted destabilisation of the primary interface favouring a quinolone-resistant DNA gyrase conformation [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Gram-negative bacilli, gyrB mutations are rare in clinical strains and they have been described at positions 426, 431, 447, 464 and 466 [44][45][46][47]. The Ser464Phe mutation has been linked to quinolone resistance in S. enterica [45], P. aeruginosa [47] and P. mirabilis [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most notably, the analysis revealed a novel 46-aminoacid-long region of GyrB, which was found to be mutated in more than 22% of the analyzed mutants. To understand the role of this region on GyrB, we subsequently performed protein structure analyses which demonstrated that this region is in the close proximity of GyrA, and forms the binding site of fluoroquinolone antibiotics [178,179] (Figure 24). Also, it should be noted that the lack of resistance-conferring mutations at ParC and ParE is in-line with previous observations [175].…”
Section: Differences In the Evolution Of Antibiotic Resistance Betweementioning
confidence: 99%