1979
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2797(79)90127-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation induction and killing of Escherichia coli by DNA adducts and crosslinks: A photobiological study with 8-methoxypsoralen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Psoralens are light-activated carcinogens that, in the presence of near-UV light, make monoadducts to thymine and interstrand crosslinks (with the exception of angelicin) in the presence of an adjacent thymine in the opposite strand (31,32), as is the case with hisG428. In the present study, psoralen, 5-methoxypsoralen, and 8-methoxypsoralen (derivatives capable of crosslinking DNA) were considerably more mutagenic than angelicin in a UvrB+ background, suggesting that the formation ofinterstrand crosslinks is the major mutagenic lesion induced, as was previously suggested (23,32). The psoralens and mitomycin C (a quinone that causes crosslinks in DNA) required a UvrB+ background for mutagenic activity, which was one of the reasons for introducing TA102 (which is UvrB+) as a new tester strain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Psoralens are light-activated carcinogens that, in the presence of near-UV light, make monoadducts to thymine and interstrand crosslinks (with the exception of angelicin) in the presence of an adjacent thymine in the opposite strand (31,32), as is the case with hisG428. In the present study, psoralen, 5-methoxypsoralen, and 8-methoxypsoralen (derivatives capable of crosslinking DNA) were considerably more mutagenic than angelicin in a UvrB+ background, suggesting that the formation ofinterstrand crosslinks is the major mutagenic lesion induced, as was previously suggested (23,32). The psoralens and mitomycin C (a quinone that causes crosslinks in DNA) required a UvrB+ background for mutagenic activity, which was one of the reasons for introducing TA102 (which is UvrB+) as a new tester strain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…TA104 is somewhat more sensitive than TA96 to reversion by all of the mutagens in Table 1 that reverted TA96 (data not shown). However, malondialdehyde is detected better (116 revertants per mg; 15 spontaneous revertants) by hisD6580 than by hisG428.. Crosslinking agents such as the psoralens and mitomycin C are lethal to uvrB strains (23,24) and therefore, were not detected as mutagens by either TA96 or TA104.…”
Section: Selection Of Hisg428 a Mutation Reverted By Chemicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two groups (6, 7) also found 8-methoxypsoraleninduced mutations in Uvr-cells, but when the cells were reirradiated with NUV to convert monoadducts to crosslinks, the yield of mutations decreased. Since cell survival also decreased upon reirradiation, it was concluded that crosslinks were lethal but not mutagenic in E. coli (6,7). Now, it is apparent that crosslinks are mutagenic, but apparently only in Uvr+ cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been apparent for some time that psoralen/NUV treatments producing both crosslinks and monoadducts induce mutations in E. coli (4)(5)(6)(7)(8). However, it was only recently that crosslinks alone were proven to be mutagenic and not just lethal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the mechanism of incision-excision of the initial adduct in a crosslink requires polymerization of the opposite strand as a template, either polymerization would have to be error prone or additional protein factors may be required in the process of cross-link repair. There is evidence that cross-link repair is a mutagenic process (146,147) suggesting that aberrant polymerization reactions under certain conditions may be a necessary consequence of a polymerasecoordinated excision reaction. There is, in addition, a suggestion that the recA protein may serve in an auxiliary capacity for excision of the cross-linked region (146,147).…”
Section: H Implications Of a Uvr-multiprotein Dna Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%