1989
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-1989-0929430-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation of knots

Abstract: In general, mutation does not preserve the Alexander module or the concordance class of a knot.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kearton [20] used these examples to show that mutation acts nontrivially on concordance. These examples were built specifically so that the Casson-Gordon method could be applied.…”
Section: Pretzel Knotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kearton [20] used these examples to show that mutation acts nontrivially on concordance. These examples were built specifically so that the Casson-Gordon method could be applied.…”
Section: Pretzel Knotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particularly interesting knot in this list is 11n 34 , which is topologically slice (since it has Alexander polynomial 1), but it is not known whether it is smoothly slice. In fact, it is a mutant of 11n 42 which is smoothly slice, but as shown by Kearton [5] mutation does not preserve concordance class, so 11n 34 is not necessarily smoothly slice.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The signature is also invariant under mutation [c.f. [Kea89]]. For pretzel knots, if we combine this fact with (1) we see that computation of the signature of K " P pp 1 , ..., p k q may be obtained using any knot in P tp 1 , ..., p k u.…”
Section: The Signature Condition and Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 97%