“…To demonstrate the utility of this score, we list below the candidates with CaSc ≥ 9 (top 15%); TANC2, GLS, ASIC1A, KMT2E, ACTL6B, GRIN3B, SPEN, DNAH14, CUX1, PUM1, UNC13A, RASGRP1, GRIA4, SLC32A1, PUM2, TOB1, MAPK8IP3, NPTX1, ETV5, CACNB4, WDFY3 (for a detailed list of all candidates, see Table S2). Fourteen of these were published or funneled into subsequent validation studies 21–29 ( TANC2, KMT2E , and WDFY3 are under review, but still unpublished data). Of the 158 candidate variants, most were de novo (n=74, 47%, of these 71 are autosomal, 3 are X linked), followed by autosomal recessive (n=68, 43%, of these 41 are compound heterozygous, and 27 are homozygous, mostly (n=22) observed in consanguineous families), and inherited variants (n=15, 9%, are X linked and one is an autosomal, paternally inherited heterozygous variant) (Figure 2 and Tables S1 and S2).…”