1980
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(80)90106-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual pounding of adjacent structures during earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Such observations triggered the interest of the research community to study the response of seismically excited adjacent buildings interacting and pounding due to insufficient clearance. Specifically, following early works on the topic (Anagnostopoulos 1988, Wolf & Skrikerud 1980, considerable research work has been devoted in recent years to develop practically useful analytical and computational models for the reliable representation of pounding forces (Anagnostopoulos 2004, Jankowski 2005, Muthukumar & DesRoches 2006, Dimitrakopoulos et al 2009, Ye et al2009, Cole et al 2011 to study the effects of these forces to the dynamic response and to the structural integrity of various types of colliding structures (Mouzakis & Papadrakakis 2004, Jankowski 2008, 2009, Mahmoud & Jankowski 2010, Polycarpou & Komodromos 2010, Giaralis & Spanos 2011, as well as to propose strategies to mitigate these effects (Spiliopoulos and Anagnostopoulos 1996,Xu et al 1999, Anagnostopoulos & Karamateas 2008, Lopez-Garcia & Soong, 2009, Polycarpou & Komodromos 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such observations triggered the interest of the research community to study the response of seismically excited adjacent buildings interacting and pounding due to insufficient clearance. Specifically, following early works on the topic (Anagnostopoulos 1988, Wolf & Skrikerud 1980, considerable research work has been devoted in recent years to develop practically useful analytical and computational models for the reliable representation of pounding forces (Anagnostopoulos 2004, Jankowski 2005, Muthukumar & DesRoches 2006, Dimitrakopoulos et al 2009, Ye et al2009, Cole et al 2011 to study the effects of these forces to the dynamic response and to the structural integrity of various types of colliding structures (Mouzakis & Papadrakakis 2004, Jankowski 2008, 2009, Mahmoud & Jankowski 2010, Polycarpou & Komodromos 2010, Giaralis & Spanos 2011, as well as to propose strategies to mitigate these effects (Spiliopoulos and Anagnostopoulos 1996,Xu et al 1999, Anagnostopoulos & Karamateas 2008, Lopez-Garcia & Soong, 2009, Polycarpou & Komodromos 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4a) vibrates with T pd and ξ pd ; while the system with one-side pounding ( fig. 4b), in addition to the peak of harmonic response, the peak of socalled subharmonic response appears at twice the resonant frequency of the pounding system [3]. However, the subharmonic response does not seem to have any significant effect.…”
Section: Harmonic Vibration With Pounding 41 Equivalent Damping Ratiomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The collision between two buildings is typically simulated by contact element, which becomes active only when contact is detected. Several types of contact element such as linear/nonlinear spring element, and linear/nonlinear viscoelastic element have been used for pounding simulation [3][4][5]. The use of numerical methods for this nonlinear dynamic problem poses many difficulties and requires time-consuming efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[49]), and between adjacent buildings (e.g. [50][51]). They also include cases of structures whose lateral movement is restricted via "stopsupports" and restrainers such as in above-ground pipelines along their transversal direction (e.g.…”
Section: Piecewise Linear Restoring Forcementioning
confidence: 99%