2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

My preferred approach to left bundle branch pacing: Lumenless leads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While acute lead perforation into the left ventricle cavity is a relatively frequent complication reported in various other studies, 7 the septal tunnel created by a lumenless lead such as SelectSecure 3830 is small and is considered to close spontaneously without detectable shunting on postprocedural echocardiography. 8 In this case, the contrast agent injected into the septum was unexpectedly able to exit through the route by the initial lead perforation. The contrast agent flowed only into the right ventricle, but not into the left ventricle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…While acute lead perforation into the left ventricle cavity is a relatively frequent complication reported in various other studies, 7 the septal tunnel created by a lumenless lead such as SelectSecure 3830 is small and is considered to close spontaneously without detectable shunting on postprocedural echocardiography. 8 In this case, the contrast agent injected into the septum was unexpectedly able to exit through the route by the initial lead perforation. The contrast agent flowed only into the right ventricle, but not into the left ventricle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The target site for the lead deployment was identified as previously described. 11 As the lead was advanced into the septum, the notch of the paced QRS in lead V 1 moved from the nadir to the end of the QRS, resulting in right bundle branch block pattern and concomitant gradual increase in unipolar pacing impedance (≥500 Ω). Four initial fast turns, and then 3 more slow turns, were performed to position the lead at the left bundle.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 3 , selective LBB capture was confirmed by the presence of a right bundle branch block pattern, V 6 –V 1 R-wave interpeak interval of 44 ms, and a constant (at high and low pacing output) R-wave peak time of 67 ms in V 6 . 11 , 12
Figure 3 Selective left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) was successfully performed after extraction of a His bundle pacing lead. Electrogram shows selective LBBP, indicated by the presence of right bundle branch delay pattern, V 6 –V 1 R-wave interpeak interval of 44 ms, a pacing stimulus–to–peak R wave (stim-LVAT) of 67 ms, and isoelectric stimulus to QRS interval.
…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A popular article type is our Perspectives in Contrast, which features 2 opposing views on therapeutic or diagnostic topics. In the February issue, Dr Jan De Pooter 4 and Drs Shunmuga Sundaram Ponnusamy and Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman 5 defended their favored type of lead for physiological pacing—either stylet-driven 4 or lumenless. 5 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the February issue, Dr Jan De Pooter 4 and Drs Shunmuga Sundaram Ponnusamy and Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman 5 defended their favored type of lead for physiological pacing—either stylet-driven 4 or lumenless. 5 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%