2020
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_1712_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MYD88 L265P mutation in intraocular lymphoma: A potential diagnostic marker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the authors acknowledged the diagnostic predictive power of any single clinical or multimodal imaging feature, they emphasized the importance of the combined presence of multiple suggestive features, such as abnormal sheets or veils or vitreous cells, subretinal infiltration, and a leopard spot pattern of RPE disruption -particularly in older, at-risk patients. Their work confirmed the utility of MYD88 mutation testing, [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] including the use of minimally invasive paracentesis -as reported recently by Hiemcke-Jiwa et al 38 and Miserocchi et al 39 Wang et al 15 evaluated six distinct fixatives for processing VRL fluid specimens with regard to preservation of cellular morphology in histology/immunohistochemistry and DNA/ RNA integrity. All tests were run on B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Pfeiffer cells.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the authors acknowledged the diagnostic predictive power of any single clinical or multimodal imaging feature, they emphasized the importance of the combined presence of multiple suggestive features, such as abnormal sheets or veils or vitreous cells, subretinal infiltration, and a leopard spot pattern of RPE disruption -particularly in older, at-risk patients. Their work confirmed the utility of MYD88 mutation testing, [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] including the use of minimally invasive paracentesis -as reported recently by Hiemcke-Jiwa et al 38 and Miserocchi et al 39 Wang et al 15 evaluated six distinct fixatives for processing VRL fluid specimens with regard to preservation of cellular morphology in histology/immunohistochemistry and DNA/ RNA integrity. All tests were run on B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Pfeiffer cells.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…The L265P mutation was identified in 20 of 29 vitreous samples (69.0%). The authors acknowledged comparably high rates of this specific MYD88 mutation in other diverse cohorts, [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] and concluded that ddPCR may offer a rapid, sensitive, and specific approach to diagnosing VRL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both cases had complete CDKN2A deletions, an alteration we have observed to be highly recurrent in VRL patients and which is a promising genomic biomarker with potential clinical utility that warrants further investigation [ 42 ]. MYD88 , a gene encoding for an NF-kB pathway component, is also recurrent in B-cell lymphomas [ 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ] and was found here as a truncal activating mutation in Case 2. Interestingly, Case 1 harbored a MYD88 p.A221T mutation with a highly subclonal status in the brain tissue sample (8% variant fraction).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…23,55 According to recent mutational analyses of DLBCL and VRL specimens, MYD88 l265P mutation has been reported in a large percentage of examined samples. 56 Additionally, Yonese et al showed that 35% of VRL vitreous samples presented CD79b mutations. 57 The MYD88 l265P mutation has also been identified as a potential diagnostic target using aqueous tap.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%