2009
DOI: 10.1159/000220601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mydriatic and Cardiovascular Effects of Phenylephrine 2.5% versus Phenylephrine 10%, Both Associated with Tropicamide 1%

Abstract: Background/Aims: To evaluate and compare cardiovascular effects (blood pressure and heart rate) of phenylephrine 2.5% versus phenylephrine 10%, and compare pupil diameter before and after instillation of eyedrops. Methods: A total of 58 patients scheduled for funduscopy were dilated with either phenylephrine 2.5% and tropicamide 1% (group 0, n = 29 patients, 58 eyes) or phenylephrine 10% and tropicamide 1% (group 1, n = 29 patients, 58 eyes). Only one drop per eye of each drug was administered. In both groups,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher concentrations, however, (1.5 or 3.0%) give significantly larger pupils. Noticeably, a similar lack of dose-response relationship has been noted by several investigators for topical phenylephrine when comparing 2.5% to 10% (Weiss, Weiss et al 1995;Tanner and Casswell 1996;Motta, Coblentz et al 2009). Applying experimental bioavailability data (Mishima 1981) and assuming an aqueous humor volume of 160 µl (Jonsson, Markstrom et al 2006) and a dose of three 37µl drops (Behndig and Linden 1998), three drops of 2.5 -10% would give intracameral doses of 0.14 and 0.57 mg phenylephrine, respectively, which is in the same range as the four lower concentrations in the dose-response study (0.02 mg -0.73 mg).…”
Section: Phenylephrinesupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher concentrations, however, (1.5 or 3.0%) give significantly larger pupils. Noticeably, a similar lack of dose-response relationship has been noted by several investigators for topical phenylephrine when comparing 2.5% to 10% (Weiss, Weiss et al 1995;Tanner and Casswell 1996;Motta, Coblentz et al 2009). Applying experimental bioavailability data (Mishima 1981) and assuming an aqueous humor volume of 160 µl (Jonsson, Markstrom et al 2006) and a dose of three 37µl drops (Behndig and Linden 1998), three drops of 2.5 -10% would give intracameral doses of 0.14 and 0.57 mg phenylephrine, respectively, which is in the same range as the four lower concentrations in the dose-response study (0.02 mg -0.73 mg).…”
Section: Phenylephrinesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Cardiovascular effects from topical mydriatic substances have been reported by many authors thoughout the years (Fraunfelder and Scafidi 1978;Meyer and Fraunfelder 1980;Fraunfelder and Meyer 1985;Hempel, Senn et al 1999;Motta, Coblentz et al 2009). A rapid absorption of anticholinergic and/or adrenergic substances via the nasal mucosa can render surprisingly high systemic levels of the substance.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other studies, a significant transient effect on hypertension has not been seen [5,6]. Furthermore, certain studies indicate the absence of hemodynamic changes with administration of either 2.5 or 10% phenylephrine drops [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…[26][27][28][29] This review focuses on combinations of phenylephrine 2.5% to 10.0% with tropicamide 0.5% to 1.0% or cyclopentolate as these are the most thoroughly studied protocols. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Phenylephrine Phenylephrine is a synthetic sympathomimetic agent with a strong and selective affinity for a 1 -receptors. Topical application of phenylephrine to the eye causes dilation of the pupil and arteriolar vasoconstriction.…”
Section: Phenylephrine and Tropicamide Or Cyclopentolate Combination mentioning
confidence: 99%